Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 23;2(8):891-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.06.018. eCollection 2015 Aug.

Vaccine Hesitancy Among General Practitioners and Its Determinants During Controversies: A National Cross-sectional Survey in France

Pierre Verger  1 , Lisa Fressard  2 , Fanny Collange  2 , Arnaud Gautier  3 , Christine Jestin  3 , Odile Launay  4 , Jocelyn Raude  5 , Céline Pulcini  6 , Patrick Peretti-Watel  2
Affiliations

Vaccine Hesitancy Among General Practitioners and Its Determinants During Controversies: A National Cross-sectional Survey in France

Pierre Verger et al. EBioMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess: 1) vaccine hesitancy (VH) prevalence among French general practitioners (GPs) through the frequency of their vaccine recommendations, and 2) the determinants of these recommendations.

Methods: Cross-sectional observational study in 2014 nested in a national panel of 1712 randomly selected GPs in private practice in France. We constructed a score of self-reported recommendation frequency for 6 specific vaccines to target populations.

Results: 16% to 43% of GPs sometimes or never recommended at least one specific vaccine to their target patients. Multivariable logistic regressions of the dichotomized score showed that GPs recommended vaccines frequently when they felt comfortable explaining their benefits and risks to patients (OR = 1.87; 1.35-2.59), or trusted official sources of information highly (OR = 1.40; 1.01-1.93). They recommended vaccines infrequently when they considered that adverse effects were likely (OR = 0.71; 0.52-0.96) or doubted the vaccine's utility (OR = 0.21; 0.15-0.29).

Interpretation: Our findings show that after repeated vaccine controversies in France, some VH exists among French GPs, whose recommendation behaviors depend on their trust in authorities, their perception of the utility and risks of vaccines, and their comfort in explaining them. Further research is needed to confirm these results among health care workers in other countries.

Keywords: Adverse effects; Attitudes of health personnel; General practitioners; Private practice; Trust; Vaccine hesitancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Allison P.D. Second Edition. SAS Institute; 2012. Logistic Regression Using SAS: Theory and Application.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: Ramachaudran V.S., editor. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. New York; 1994. pp. 71–81.
    1. Bean S.J., Catania J.A. Vaccine perceptions among Oregon health care providers. Qual. Health Res. 2013;23:1251–1266. - PubMed
    1. Benin A.L., Wisler-Scher D.J., Colson E., Shapiro E.D., Holmboe E.S. Qualitative analysis of mothers' decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1532–1541. - PubMed
    1. Bish A., Yardley L., Nicoll A., Michie S. Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2011;29:6472–6484. - PubMed