Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Nov;97(8):549-55.
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2015.0024. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

Are general surgeons able to accurately self-assess their level of technical skills?

C Rizan  1 , J Ansell  2 , T W Tilston  1 , N Warren  2 , J Torkington  3
Affiliations
Review

Are general surgeons able to accurately self-assess their level of technical skills?

C Rizan et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Self-assessment is a way of improving technical capabilities without the need for trainer feedback. It can identify areas for improvement and promote professional medical development. The aim of this review was to identify whether self-assessment is an accurate form of technical skills appraisal in general surgery.

Methods: The PubMed, MEDLINE(®), Embase(™) and Cochrane databases were searched for studies assessing the reliability of self-assessment of technical skills in general surgery. For each study, we recorded the skills assessed and the evaluation methods used. Common endpoints between studies were compared to provide recommendations based on the levels of evidence.

Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria from 22,292 initial papers. There was no level 1 evidence published. All papers compared the correlation between self-appraisal versus an expert score but differed in the technical skills assessment and the evaluation tools used. The accuracy of self-assessment improved with increasing experience (level 2 recommendation), age (level 3 recommendation) and the use of video playback (level 3 recommendation). Accuracy was reduced by stressful learning environments (level 2 recommendation), lack of familiarity with assessment tools (level 3 recommendation) and in advanced surgical procedures (level 3 recommendation).

Conclusions: Evidence exists to support the reliability of self-assessment of technical skills in general surgery. Several variables have been shown to affect the accuracy of self-assessment of technical skills. Future work should focus on evaluating the reliability of self-assessment during live operating procedures.

Keywords: General surgery; Self-assessment; Technical skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of studies included in systematic review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 1982; : 122–147.
    1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in General Surgery. Chicago: ACGME; 2012.
    1. Spencer JA, Jordan RK. Learner centred approaches in medical education. BMJ 1999; : 1,280–1, 283. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans AW, Leeson RM, Petrie A. Reliability of peer and self-assessment scores compared with trainers’ scores following third molar surgery. Med Educ 2007; : 866–872. - PubMed
    1. MacDonald J, Williams RG, Rogers DA. Self-assessment in simulation-based surgical skills training. Am J Surg 2003; : 319–322. - PubMed