Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;109(5):427-39.
doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000350.

The Effect of Radiation Dose and Variation in Neupogen® Initiation Schedule on the Mitigation of Myelosuppression during the Concomitant GI-ARS and H-ARS in a Nonhuman Primate Model of High-dose Exposure with Marrow Sparing

Affiliations

The Effect of Radiation Dose and Variation in Neupogen® Initiation Schedule on the Mitigation of Myelosuppression during the Concomitant GI-ARS and H-ARS in a Nonhuman Primate Model of High-dose Exposure with Marrow Sparing

Thomas J MacVittie et al. Health Phys. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

A nonhuman primate (NHP) model of acute high-dose, partial-body irradiation with 5% bone marrow (PBI/BM5) sparing was used to assess the effect of Neupogen® [granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)] to mitigate the associated myelosuppression when administered at an increasing interval between exposure and initiation of treatment. A secondary objective was to assess the effect of Neupogen® on the mortality or morbidity of the hematopoietic (H)- acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and concurrent acute gastrointestinal radiation syndrome (GI-ARS). NHP were exposed to 10.0 or 11.0 Gy with 6 MV LINAC-derived photons at approximately 0.80 Gy min. All NHP received medical management. NHP were dosed daily with control article (5% dextrose in water) initiated on day 1 post-exposure or Neupogen® (10 μg kg) initiated on day 1, day 3, or day 5 until recovery [absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,000 cells μL for three consecutive days]. Mortality in both the 10.0 Gy and 11.0 Gy cohorts suggested that early administration of Neupogen® at day 1 post exposure may affect acute GI-ARS mortality, while Neupogen® appeared to mitigate mortality due to the H-ARS. However, the study was not powered to detect statistically significant differences in survival. The ability of Neupogen® to stimulate granulopoiesis was assessed by evaluating key parameters for ANC recovery: the depth of nadir, duration of neutropenia (ANC < 500 cells μL) and recovery time to ANC ≥ 1,000 cells μL. Following 10.0 Gy PBI/BM5, the mean duration of neutropenia was 11.6 d in the control cohort vs. 3.5 d and 4.6 d in the day 1 and day 3 Neupogen® cohorts, respectively. The respective ANC nadirs were 94 cells μL, 220 cells μL, and 243 cells μL for the control and day 1 and day 3 Neupogen® cohorts. Following 11.0 Gy PBI/BM5, the duration of neutropenia was 10.9 d in the control cohort vs. 2.8 d, 3.8 d, and 4.5 d in the day 1, day 3, and day 5 Neupogen® cohorts, respectively. The respective ANC nadirs for the control and day 1, day 3, and day 5 Neupogen® cohorts were 131 cells μL, 292 cells μL, 236 cells μL, and 217 cells μL, respectively. Therefore, the acceleration of granulopoiesis by Neupogen® in this model is independent of the time interval between radiation exposure and treatment initiation up to 5 d post-exposure. The PBI/BM5 model can be used to assess medical countermeasure efficacy in the context of the concurrent GI- and H-ARS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. TBI vs. PBI/BM5 GI- and H-ARS survival curves.
Rhesus macaques were exposed to TBI or PBI/BM5 utilizing 6 MV LINAC-derived photons. Animals were euthanized according to a set of IACUC-approved clinical criteria. Probit curves of 15- and 60-day survival are plotted.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. ANC kinetics post-PBI/BM5 or TBI with Neupogen® treatment.
Rhesus macaques were exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy PBI/BM5 or TBI, or 7.5 Gy TBI utilizing 6 MV LINAC-derived photons. Animals were administered control article (5% dextrose in water) or Neupogen® beginning at the indicated times post-irradiation, through the third consecutive day an ANC ≥ 1,000 μL−1 was observed post-nadir. Peripheral blood was drawn daily, and the ANC was calculated using values obtained from an automated CBC and manual WBC differential. The plotted values are means. A comparison between irradiation models and doses is shown in (a), while comparisons between control and Neupogen®-treated cohorts exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy are shown in (b) and (c), respectively.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. ANC kinetics post-PBI/BM5 or TBI with Neupogen® treatment.
Rhesus macaques were exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy PBI/BM5 or TBI, or 7.5 Gy TBI utilizing 6 MV LINAC-derived photons. Animals were administered control article (5% dextrose in water) or Neupogen® beginning at the indicated times post-irradiation, through the third consecutive day an ANC ≥ 1,000 μL−1 was observed post-nadir. Peripheral blood was drawn daily, and the ANC was calculated using values obtained from an automated CBC and manual WBC differential. The plotted values are means. A comparison between irradiation models and doses is shown in (a), while comparisons between control and Neupogen®-treated cohorts exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy are shown in (b) and (c), respectively.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. ANC kinetics post-PBI/BM5 or TBI with Neupogen® treatment.
Rhesus macaques were exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy PBI/BM5 or TBI, or 7.5 Gy TBI utilizing 6 MV LINAC-derived photons. Animals were administered control article (5% dextrose in water) or Neupogen® beginning at the indicated times post-irradiation, through the third consecutive day an ANC ≥ 1,000 μL−1 was observed post-nadir. Peripheral blood was drawn daily, and the ANC was calculated using values obtained from an automated CBC and manual WBC differential. The plotted values are means. A comparison between irradiation models and doses is shown in (a), while comparisons between control and Neupogen®-treated cohorts exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy are shown in (b) and (c), respectively.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Platelet kinetics post-PBI/BM5 with Neupogen® treatment.
Rhesus macaques were exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy PBI/BM5 or TBI utilizing 6 MV LINAC-derived photons. Animals were administered control article (5% dextrose in water) or Neupogen® beginning at the indicated times post-irradiation, through the third consecutive day an ANC ≥ 1,000 μL−1 was observed post-nadir. Peripheral blood was drawn daily, and the platelet counts were obtained from an automated CBC. The plotted values are means. A comparison between irradiation models and doses is shown in (a), while comparisons between control and Neupogen®-treated cohorts exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy are shown in (b) and (c), respectively.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Platelet kinetics post-PBI/BM5 with Neupogen® treatment.
Rhesus macaques were exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy PBI/BM5 or TBI utilizing 6 MV LINAC-derived photons. Animals were administered control article (5% dextrose in water) or Neupogen® beginning at the indicated times post-irradiation, through the third consecutive day an ANC ≥ 1,000 μL−1 was observed post-nadir. Peripheral blood was drawn daily, and the platelet counts were obtained from an automated CBC. The plotted values are means. A comparison between irradiation models and doses is shown in (a), while comparisons between control and Neupogen®-treated cohorts exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy are shown in (b) and (c), respectively.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Platelet kinetics post-PBI/BM5 with Neupogen® treatment.
Rhesus macaques were exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy PBI/BM5 or TBI utilizing 6 MV LINAC-derived photons. Animals were administered control article (5% dextrose in water) or Neupogen® beginning at the indicated times post-irradiation, through the third consecutive day an ANC ≥ 1,000 μL−1 was observed post-nadir. Peripheral blood was drawn daily, and the platelet counts were obtained from an automated CBC. The plotted values are means. A comparison between irradiation models and doses is shown in (a), while comparisons between control and Neupogen®-treated cohorts exposed to 10.0 Gy or 11.0 Gy are shown in (b) and (c), respectively.

References

    1. Baranov AE. Allogenic Bone Marrow Transplantation After Severe, Uniform Total-Body Irradiation: Experience From Recent (Nyasvizh, Belarus) and Previous Radiation Accidents. In: MacVittie TJ, Weiss JF, Browne D, eds. Advances in the Treatment of Radiation Injuries: Advances in the Biosciences, Vol. 94. Tarrytown, NY: Pergamon; 1996: 281–293.
    1. Baranov AE and Guskova AK. Acute radiation disease in Chernobyl accident victims. In: Ricks RC, Fry SA, eds. The medical basis for radiation accident preparedness II; Clinical Experience and follow-up since 1979. New York: Elsevier; 1990: 79–87.
    1. Bertho JM, Frick J, Prat M, Demarquay C, Dudoignon N, Trompier F, Gorin C, Thierry D, Gourmelon P. Comparison of Autologous Cell Therapy and Granulocyte colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Injection vs G-CSF Alone for the Treatment of Acute Radiation Syndrome in a Nonhuman Primate Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:911–920; 2005a. - PubMed
    1. Bertho JM, Prat M, Frick J, Demarquay C, Gaugler MH, Dudoignon N, Clairand I, Chapel A, Gorin NC, Thierry D. Application of autologous hematopoietic cell therapy to a nonhuman primate model of heterogeneous high-dose irradiation. Radiat Res 163:557–570; 2005b. - PubMed
    1. Bond VP, Carsten AL, Bullis J, Roth SP. Severity of Organ Injury as a Predictor of Acute Mortality for Disparate Patterns of Absorbed Dose Distribution. Radiat Res 128:S9–S11; 1991. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms