Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Sep;94(39):e1633.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001633.

The Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer of Women With Endometriosis May be Varied Greatly if Diagnostic Criteria Are Different: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

The Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer of Women With Endometriosis May be Varied Greatly if Diagnostic Criteria Are Different: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Wen-Ling Lee et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep.

Abstract

This article aims to test the hypothesis that the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in women with endometriosis might be changed by enrolling different population. A nationwide 14-year historic cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan and the Registry for Catastrophic Illness Patients was conducted. A total of 239,385 women aged between 20 and 51 years, with at least 1 gynecologic visit after 2000, were analyzed. Cases included women with a diagnosed endometriosis, which was established along a spectrum from at least 1 medical record of endometriosis (recalled endometriosis) to tissue-proved ovarian endometriosis (n = X). Controls included women without any diagnosis of endometriosis (n = 239,385 - X). We used Cox regression, and computed hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to determine the risk of EOC in patients. The EOC incidence rates (IRs, per 10,000 person-years) of women with endometriosis ranged from 1.90 in women with recalled endometriosis to 18.70 in women with tissue-proved ovarian endometrioma, compared with those women without any diagnosis of endometriosis (0.77-0.89), contributing to crude HRs ranging from 2.59 (95% CI, 2.09-3.21; P < 0.001) to 24.04 (95% CI, 17.48-33.05; P < 0.001). After adjustment for pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, Charlson co-morbidity index, and age, adjusted HRs were ranged from the lowest of 1.90 (95% CI, 1.51-2.37; P < 0.001) in recalled endometriosis to the highest of 18.57 (95% CI, 13.37-25.79; P < 0.001) in tissue-proved ovarian endometrioma, which was inversely related to the prevalence rate of endometriosis (from the highest of 30.80% in recalled endometriosis to the lowest of 1.54% in tissue-proved ovarian endometrioma). The risk of EOC in women with endometriosis varied greatly by different criteria used. Women with endometriosis might have a more apparently higher risk than those reported by systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Confounding factors might influence the risk estimation of epithelial ovarian cancer in women with endometriosis.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Cohort flow chart illustrating the inclusion and exclusion criteria of participants in the study (Group A: at least one medical record of endometriosis at outpatient clinics or during hospitalization (recalled endometriosis and/or self-reported endometriosis).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plot assessing overall women with endometriosis, based on 13 different diagnostic criteria in this study and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The relationship between enrollment in this cohort and the occurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer was evaluated using the Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard estimates model. The data are based on the different diagnostic criteria of endometriosis (from Group A: at least one medical record of endometriosis at outpatient clinics or during hospitalization—recalled or self-reported endometriosis to Group M: tissue-proved ovarian endometrioma). The detailed information is shown in the Table 1.
FIGURE 4 (Continued)
FIGURE 4 (Continued)
The relationship between enrollment in this cohort and the occurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer was evaluated using the Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard estimates model. The data are based on the different diagnostic criteria of endometriosis (from Group A: at least one medical record of endometriosis at outpatient clinics or during hospitalization—recalled or self-reported endometriosis to Group M: tissue-proved ovarian endometrioma). The detailed information is shown in the Table 1.
FIGURE 4 (Continued)
FIGURE 4 (Continued)
The relationship between enrollment in this cohort and the occurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer was evaluated using the Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard estimates model. The data are based on the different diagnostic criteria of endometriosis (from Group A: at least one medical record of endometriosis at outpatient clinics or during hospitalization—recalled or self-reported endometriosis to Group M: tissue-proved ovarian endometrioma). The detailed information is shown in the Table 1.

References

    1. Nezhat FR, Apostol R, Nezhat C, et al. New insights in the pathophysiology of ovarian cancer and implications for screening and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; pii: S0002-9378 00325-7. - PubMed
    1. Kvaskoff M, Mu F, Terry KL, et al. Endometriosis: a high-risk population for major chronic diseases? Hum Reprod Update 2015; 21:500–516. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zafrakas M, Grimbizis G, Timologou A, et al. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Front Surg 2014; 1:14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heidemann LN, Hartwell D, Heidemann CH, et al. The relation between endometriosis and ovarian cancer - a review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93:20–31. - PubMed
    1. Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, et al. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2014; 10:261–275. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms