Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Sep;94(39):e1647.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001647.

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis of Upfront Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Arterial Abutment

Affiliations
Observational Study

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis of Upfront Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Arterial Abutment

Tsutomu Fujii et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Combined arterial resection during pancreatectomy can be a challenging treatment, and outcome would be more favorable if the tumor becomes technically removable from the artery. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) is expected to achieve locoregional control and enable margin-negative resection. To investigate the effects of NACRT in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) which were deemed borderline resectable through preoperative imaging due to abutment of the major artery, including the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or common hepatic artery (CHA), but were still considered to be technically removable. In the current study, comparisons were make between 71 patients who underwent upfront surgery and 21 patients who underwent NACRT followed by surgery in the strategy to preserve the artery, using unmatched and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis (UMIN000017115). Fifty patients in the upfront surgery group and 18 in the NACRT group underwent curative resection (70% vs 86%, respectively; P = 0.16). The results of the propensity score weighted logistic regressions indicated that the incidences of pathological lymph node metastasis and a pathological positive resection margin were significantly lower in the NACRT group (odds ratio, 0.006; P < 0.001 and odds ratio, 0.007; P < 0.001, respectively). Among the propensity-score matched patients, the estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates in the upfront surgery group were 66.7% and 16.0%, respectively, and those in the NACRT group were 80.0% and 65.2%, respectively. In conclusion, it was suggested that chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery provided clinical benefits in patients with PDACs in contact with the SMA or CHA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study profile and clinical course of the upfront surgery and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) groups.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Representative multidetector high-resolution CT scans. (A) Direct abutment of the CHA without extension to the celiac axis and (B) tumor abutment of the SMA not to exceeding 180° of the circumference of the vessel wall. CHA = common hepatic artery, CT = computed tomography, SMA = superior mesenteric artery.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A) Kaplan–Meier curves for disease specific survival after initiation of treatment for unmatched patients who underwent upfront surgery (N = 71) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) (N = 21; P = 0.001). The median survival times in the upfront surgery and NACRT groups were 13.1 and 29.1 months, respectively. (B) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the propensity score-matched upfront surgery (N = 17) and NACRT (N = 17) groups (P = 0.007). In the upfront surgery group, the median survival time was 13.9 months, and the estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates were 66.7% and 16.0%, respectively. In the NACRT group, the median survival time could not be calculated because the survival curve did not reach the 50% line before the end of the study, and the estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates were 80.0% and 65.2%, respectively.

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62:10–29. - PubMed
    1. Wray CJ, Ahmad SA, Matthews JB, et al. Surgery for pancreatic cancer: recent controversies and current practice. Gastroenterology 2005; 128:1626–1641. - PubMed
    1. Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA 2013; 310:1473–1481. - PubMed
    1. Nakao A, Takeda S, Inoue S, et al. Indications and techniques of extended resection for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 2006; 30:976–982. - PubMed
    1. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, et al. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 2006; 244:10–15. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types