Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;16(3):247-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Students for Nutrition and eXercise (SNaX)

Joseph A Ladapo  1 , Laura M Bogart  2 , David J Klein  3 , Burton O Cowgill  4 , Kimberly Uyeda  5 , David G Binkle  6 , Elizabeth R Stevens  7 , Mark A Schuster  8
Affiliations

Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Students for Nutrition and eXercise (SNaX)

Joseph A Ladapo et al. Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the cost and cost-effectiveness of implementing Students for Nutrition and eXercise (SNaX), a 5-week middle school-based obesity-prevention intervention combining school-wide environmental changes, multimedia, encouragement to eat healthy school cafeteria foods, and peer-led education.

Methods: Five intervention and 5 control middle schools (mean enrollment, 1520 students) from the Los Angeles Unified School District participated in a randomized controlled trial of SNaX. Acquisition costs for materials and time and wage data for employees involved in implementing the program were used to estimate fixed and variable costs. Cost-effectiveness was determined using the ratio of variable costs to program efficacy outcomes.

Results: The costs of implementing the program over 5 weeks were $5433.26 per school in fixed costs and $2.11 per student in variable costs, equaling a total cost of $8637.17 per school, or $0.23 per student per day. This investment yielded significant increases in the proportion of students served fruit and lunch and a significant decrease in the proportion of students buying snacks. The cost-effectiveness of the program, per student over 5 weeks, was $1.20 per additional fruit served during meals, $8.43 per additional full-priced lunch served, $2.11 per additional reduced-price/free lunch served, and $1.69 per reduction in snacks sold.

Conclusions: SNaX demonstrated the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of a middle school-based obesity-prevention intervention combining school-wide environmental changes, multimedia, encouragement to eat healthy school cafeteria foods, and peer-led education. Its cost is modest and unlikely to be a significant barrier to adoption for many schools considering its implementation.

Keywords: adolescents; cost; cost-effectiveness; fruits; health promotion; nutrition; schools; vegetables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Dr. Ladapo had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

References

    1. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Nutrition Standards for Food in Schools: Leading the Way Toward Healthier Youth. Washington, DC: 2007.
    1. Davis MM, Gance-Cleveland B, Hassink S, Johnson R, Paradis G, Resnicow K. Recommendations for prevention of childhood obesity. Pediatrics. 2007;120:S229–53. - PubMed
    1. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011;378:815–25. - PubMed
    1. [Accessed 7/31/14];How can healthier school snacks and beverages improve student health and help school budgets? 2013 at http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2013/rwjf72649.
    1. Cradock AL, McHugh A, Mont-Ferguson H, et al. Effect of school district policy change on consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages among high school students, Boston, Massachusetts, 2004–2006. Preventing chronic disease. 2011;8:A74. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types