Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;86(11):1072-82.
doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0090-0.

[Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival in mid-to-low rectal cancer]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival in mid-to-low rectal cancer]

[Article in German]
T Jäger et al. Chirurg. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after sphincter preserving anterior rectal resection in patients with rectal cancer is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The impact of AL on long-term survival has, however, still not been sufficiently investigated and is currently the subject of controversial discussion.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of AL on long-term survival in patients with Union of International Cancer Control (UICC) (y)0-III stage mid-to-low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter preserving rectal resection.

Material and methods: A total of 108 patients with a mid-to-low rectal cancer (UICC stage (y)0-III) who underwent sphincter preserving surgery between January 2003 and October 2010 were identified within the institutional prospective colorectal cancer database. The impact of AL on 5-year overall (OS), cancer specific (CSS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) was investigated.

Results: The overall leakage rate was 17.6 % (grade A 4.6 %, grade B 4.6 % and grade C 8.3 %). After a median follow-up of 70 months (range 24-123 months), patients with an anastomotic leakage had a significantly decreased 5-year OS (63.6 % versus 87.8 %, p = 0.02), CSS (72.2 % versus 93.5 %, p = 0.02) and RFS rate (61.1 % versus 84.2 %, p = 0.01). In univariable Cox regression analysis AL was associated with an unfavorable OS (hazard ratio HR 3.05, 95 % CI: 1.11-8.39, p = 0.03), CSS (HR 4.21, 95 % CI: 1.13-15.70, p = 0.03) and RFS (HR 3.02, 95 % CI: 1.20-7.58, p = 0.02).

Conclusion: In the study cohort anastomotic leakage after sphincter preserving anterior resection in patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer was associated with a significantly unfavorable impact on overall and oncological survival.

Keywords: Anastomotic leakage; Long term survival; Low anterior resection; Rectal cancer; Sphincter preservation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cancer. 2009 Aug 1;115(15):3483-8 - PubMed
    1. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jul;12(7 Online):e76-81 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):255-9 - PubMed
    1. Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jan;7(1):51-7 - PubMed
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1991 Nov;6(4):179-83 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources