Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Dec 19;386(10012):2507-19.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00310-4. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

Intermittent screening and treatment or intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the control of malaria during pregnancy in western Kenya: an open-label, three-group, randomised controlled superiority trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Intermittent screening and treatment or intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the control of malaria during pregnancy in western Kenya: an open-label, three-group, randomised controlled superiority trial

Meghna Desai et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Every year, more than 32 million pregnancies in sub-Saharan Africa are at risk of malaria infection and its adverse consequences. The effectiveness of the intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine strategy recommended by WHO is threatened by high levels of parasite resistance. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of two alternative strategies: intermittent screening with malaria rapid diagnostic tests and treatment of women who test positive with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, and intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine.

Methods: We did this open-label, three-group, randomised controlled superiority trial at four sites in western Kenya with high malaria transmission and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance. HIV-negative pregnant women between 16 and 32 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned (1:1:1), via computer-generated permuted-block randomisation (block sizes of three, six, and nine), to receive intermittent screening and treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, or intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Study participants, study clinic nurses, and the study coordinator were aware of treatment allocation, but allocation was concealed from study investigators, delivery unit nurses, and laboratory staff. The primary outcome was malaria infection at delivery, defined as a composite of peripheral or placental parasitaemia detected by placental histology, microscopy, or rapid diagnostic test. The primary analysis was by modified intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01669941.

Findings: Between Aug 21, 2012, and June 19, 2014, we randomly assigned 1546 women to receive intermittent screening and treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (n=515), intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (n=516), or intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (n=515); 1368 (88%) women comprised the intention-to-treat population for the primary endpoint. Prevalence of malaria infection at delivery was lower in the intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group than in the intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group (15 [3%] of 457 women vs 47 [10%] of 459 women; relative risk 0·32, 95% CI 0·18-0·56; p<0·0001), but not in the intermittent screening and treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group (57 [13%] of 452 women; 1·23, 0·86-1·77; p=0·26). Compared with intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was associated with a lower incidence of malaria infection during pregnancy (192·0 vs 54·4 events per 100 person-years; incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·28, 95% CI 0·22-0·36; p<0·0001) and clinical malaria during pregnancy (37·9 vs 6·1 events; 0·16, 0·08-0·33; p<0·0001), whereas intermittent screening and treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was associated with a higher incidence of malaria infection (232·0 events; 1·21, 1·03-1·41; p=0·0177) and clinical malaria (53·4 events; 1·41, 1·00-1·98; p=0·0475). We recorded 303 maternal and infant serious adverse events, which were least frequent in the intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group.

Interpretation: At current levels of rapid diagnostic test sensitivity, intermittent screening and treatment is not a suitable alternative to intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in the context of high sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance and malaria transmission. However, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is a promising alternative drug to replace sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment. Future studies should investigate the efficacy, safety, operational feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine.

Funding: The Malaria in Pregnancy Consortium, which is funded through a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests

We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Trial profile
ISTp-DP=intermittent screening and treatment during pregnancy with dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine. IPTp-DP=intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy with dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine. IPTp-SP=intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine. *Women reporting to antenatal care clinics before 16 weeks’ gestation were booked into the trial, but were not randomised or given intervention until their next visit at 16 weeks’ gestation or more. †Composite of preterm delivery, low birthweight, or small for gestational age.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Malaria at time of delivery (A) and newborn morbidity outcome (B) by treatment group in the intention-to-treat population
Data are n/N (%), unless otherwise specified. Malaria infection at delivery detected by placental histology, microscopy, or rapid diagnostic tests. RR=relative risk. ISTp-DP=intermittent screening and treatment during pregnancy with dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine. IPTp-DP=intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy with dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine. IPTp-SP=intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine. *Adjusted for site, gravidity (in all-gravidities model), malaria at enrolment by PCR, rain or seasonality 6 months before delivery, maternal height (malaria infection model only), use of longlasting insecticide-treated nets during pregnancy, haemoglobin concentration at enrolment, gestational age at enrolment, and educational status of mother.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Incidence of malaria infection, clinical malaria, and all-cause sick-clinic visits during pregnancy by treatment group in the intention-to-treat population
Data are the number of women with an event and the number of events/person-time of follow-up, with incidence rate per 100 person-years, unless otherwise specified. Malaria infection defined by microscopy or PCR. IRR=incidence rate ratio. ISTp-DP=intermittent screening and treatment during pregnancy with dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine. IPTp-DP=intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy with dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine. IPTp-SP=intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine.

Comment in

References

    1. Dellicour S, Tatem AJ, Guerra CA, Snow RW, ter Kuile FO. Quantifying the number of pregnancies at risk of malaria in 2007: a demographic study. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Desai M, ter Kuile FO, Nosten F, et al. Epidemiology and burden of malaria in pregnancy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:93–104. - PubMed
    1. Walker PG, ter Kuile FO, Garske T, Menendez C, Ghani AC. Estimated risk of placental infection and low birthweight attributable to Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Africa in 2010: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e460–67. - PubMed
    1. WHO. A strategic framework for malaria prevention and control during pregnancy in the African region. Brazzaville: WHO Regional Office for Africa; 2004.
    1. Eisele TP, Larsen DA, Anglewicz PA, et al. Malaria prevention in pregnancy, birthweight, and neonatal mortality: a meta-analysis of 32 national cross-sectional datasets in Africa. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:942–49. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data