Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct;25(10):1456-65.
doi: 10.1101/gr.191122.115.

Linking RNA biology to lncRNAs

Affiliations
Review

Linking RNA biology to lncRNAs

Loyal A Goff et al. Genome Res. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

The regulatory potential of RNA has never ceased to amaze: from RNA catalysis, to RNA-mediated splicing, to RNA-based silencing of an entire chromosome during dosage compensation. More recently, thousands of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) transcripts have been identified, the majority with unknown function. Thus, it is tempting to think that these lncRNAs represent a cadre of new factors that function through ribonucleic mechanisms. Some evidence points to several lncRNAs with tantalizing physiological contributions and thought-provoking molecular modalities. However, dissecting the RNA biology of lncRNAs has been difficult, and distinguishing the independent contributions of functional RNAs from underlying DNA elements, or the local act of transcription, is challenging. Here, we aim to survey the existing literature and highlight future approaches that will be needed to link the RNA-based biology and mechanisms of lncRNAs in vitro and in vivo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Experimental approaches to manipulate the expression, perturb the activity, or evaluate the functions of long noncoding RNAs. Most commonly used are transient expression of exogenous oligonucleotides designed to exploit the endogenous RNAi machinery or RNase H activity to degrade an RNA (A) or occlude putative functional regions (B). Recently, strategies have used the flexible CRISPR/Cas9 system to positively or negatively affect the transcription of a lncRNA gene (C) or the incorporation of an auto-catalytic regulatory RNA element to destabilize the nascent lncRNA transcript (D). An alternative to manipulating lncRNA expression levels involves the recruitment of the RNA of interest to a particular genomic locus or reporter gene through fusion of DNA-binding proteins with RNA-binding elements such as MS2 stem–loops (E) or covalent tethering of a lncRNA transcript to the CRISPR/Cas9 guide RNA (F).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Genetic approaches to evaluate lncRNA functional contributions. (A) Genetic ablation of a lncRNA gene or a lncRNA promoter is a powerful technique that can be used to confirm any regulatory activity arising from a particular locus. The optional incorporation of a reporter gene at the deleted locus can be used to visualize the biological contexts in which the lncRNA gene is expressed and evaluate any contribution of the local act of transcription to an observed phenotype. (B) An alternative strategy is to introduce a premature transcriptional terminator sequence, which will prevent transcription of the full-length lncRNA transcript. With this approach, however, it is not possible to assess the contribution of the act of transcription. (C) With either approach, the rescue of any observed phenotype by transgene expression is currently still considered the gold standard to confirm a functional lncRNA molecule; however, a rescue may not be possible if the RNA works exclusively in cis.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Functionally equivalent RNA and DNA domains. Despite distinct mechanisms by which they achieve their equivalence, RNA domains are capable of affecting many biological activities that have traditionally been ascribed exclusively to proteins. Much work remains, however, in identifying common RNA primary, secondary, and tertiary structures that comprise orthologous functional domains and can mediate these and other subcellular activities.

References

    1. Adamson B, Smogorzewska A, Sigoillot FD, King RW, Elledge SJ. 2012. A genome-wide homologous recombination screen identifies the RNA-binding protein RBMX as a component of the DNA-damage response. Nat Cell Biol 14: 318–328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amaral PP, Clark MB, Gascoigne DK, Dinger ME, Mattick JS. 2011. lncRNAdb: a reference database for long noncoding RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D146–D151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson DM, Anderson KM, Chang CL, Makarewich CA, Nelson BR, McAnally JR, Kasaragod P, Shelton JM, Liou J, Bassel-Duby R, et al. 2015. A micropeptide encoded by a putative long noncoding RNA regulates muscle performance. Cell 160: 595–606. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Augoff K, McCue B, Plow EF, Sossey-Alaoui K. 2012. miR-31 and its host gene lncRNA LOC554202 are regulated by promoter hypermethylation in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer 11: 5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Austin CP, Battey JF, Bradley A, Bucan M, Capecchi M, Collins FS, Dove WF, Duyk G, Dymecki S, Eppig JT, et al. 2004. The knockout mouse project. Nat Genet 36: 921–924. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources