Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;23(1):40-51.
doi: 10.1111/geb.12096. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

Global patterns of freshwater species diversity, threat and endemism

Affiliations

Global patterns of freshwater species diversity, threat and endemism

Ben Collen et al. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: Global-scale studies are required to identify broad-scale patterns in the distributions of species, to evaluate the processes that determine diversity and to determine how similar or different these patterns and processes are among different groups of freshwater species. Broad-scale patterns of spatial variation in species distribution are central to many fundamental questions in macroecology and conservation biology. We aimed to evaluate how congruent three commonly used metrics of diversity were among taxa for six groups of freshwater species.

Location: Global.

Methods: We compiled geographical range data on 7083 freshwater species of mammals, amphibians, reptiles, fishes, crabs and crayfish to evaluate how species richness, richness of threatened species and endemism are distributed across freshwater ecosystems. We evaluated how congruent these measures of diversity were among taxa at a global level for a grid cell size of just under 1°.

Results: We showed that although the risk of extinction faced by freshwater decapods is quite similar to that of freshwater vertebrates, there is a distinct lack of spatial congruence in geographical range between different taxonomic groups at this spatial scale, and a lack of congruence among three commonly used metrics of biodiversity. The risk of extinction for freshwater species was consistently higher than for their terrestrial counterparts.

Main conclusions: We demonstrate that broad-scale patterns of species richness, threatened-species richness and endemism lack congruence among the six freshwater taxonomic groups examined. Invertebrate species are seldom taken into account in conservation planning. Our study suggests that both the metric of biodiversity and the identity of the taxa on which conservation decisions are based require careful consideration. As geographical range information becomes available for further sets of species, further testing will be warranted into the extent to which geographical variation in the richness of these six freshwater groups reflects broader patterns of biodiversity in fresh water.

Keywords: Congruence; conservation planning; decapods; diversity metric; geographical range; species richness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Global richness maps for freshwater species: (a) total non-normalized species richness; (b) total normalized species richness; (c) threatened species; (d) restricted-range species; and (e) data-deficient species.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Extinction risk of global freshwater fauna by taxonomic group. Central vertical lines represent the best estimate of the proportion of species threatened with extinction, with whiskers showing confidence limits. Data for fish and reptiles are samples from the respective group; all other data are comprehensive assessments of all species (n = 568 crayfish, 1191 crabs, 630 fish, 57 reptiles, 490 mammals and 4147 amphibians). Solid colours are threatened species, from left to right: black, extinct; darkest grey, critically endangered; mid-grey, endangered; light grey, vulnerable; lightest grey, data deficient. Patterned bars are non-threatened species: hatched, near threatened; dotted, least concern.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Global threat levels for three freshwater habitats. Central vertical lines represent the best estimate of the proportion of vertebrate and decapod species threatened with extinction, with whiskers showing confidence limits. Numbers of species are 2797 in lakes, 1281 in marshes and 5374 in flowing water. Solid colours are threatened species, from left to right: black, extinct; darkest grey, critically endangered; mid-grey, endangered; light grey, vulnerable; lightest grey, data deficient. Patterned bars are non-threatened species: hatched, near threatened; dotted, least concern.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cross-taxon congruence for two metrics of diversity, species richness and threatened-species richness. Bars show the proportion of freshwater ecosystems shared between five different freshwater taxa and amphibians: black bar, crabs; diagonal hatching, crayfish; grey, fish; vertical hatching, mammals; white, reptiles.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Global drivers of threats causing decline of freshwater vertebrate and decapod species (n = 1674 threatened species).

References

    1. Abell R, Thieme ML, Revenga C, et al. Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience. 2008;58:403–414.
    1. Baillie JEM, Collen B, Amin R, Akcakaya HR, Butchart SHM, Brummitt N, Meagher TR, Ram M, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace G. Towards monitoring global biodiversity. Conservation Letters. 2008;1:18–26.
    1. Balian EV, Segers H, Lévèque C, Martens K. The Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment: an overview of the results. Hydrobiologia. 2008;595:627–637.
    1. Böhm M, Collen B, Baillie JEM, et al. The conservation status of the world's reptiles. Biological Conservaion. 2013;157:372–385.
    1. Boyero L, Pearson RG, Dudgeon D, et al. Global patterns of stream detritivore distribution: implications for biodiversity loss in changing climates. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2012;21:134–141.

LinkOut - more resources