Comparison of conventional versus three-dimensional ultrasound in fetal renal pelvis measurement and their potential prediction of neonatal uropathies
- PMID: 26430907
- DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1090970
Comparison of conventional versus three-dimensional ultrasound in fetal renal pelvis measurement and their potential prediction of neonatal uropathies
Abstract
Objective: To establish a threshold value for fetal renal pelvis dilatation measured by automatic volume calculation (SonoAVC) in the third trimester of pregnancy to predict neonatal uropathies, and to compare these results with conventional antero-posterior (AP) measurement, fetal kidney 3D volume and renal parenchymal thickness.
Methods: In a prospective cohort study, 125 fetuses with renal pelvis AP diameter of ≥5 mm both at 20 weeks of gestation and in the third trimester, underwent an additional 3D volume measurement of the fetal kidney in the third trimester. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for establishing threshold values for fetal renal pelvis volume, AP measurement, fetal kidney volume and renal parenchymal thickness to predict neonatal uropathies were analyzed. Also, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) and likelihood ratios were calculated.
Results: A cut-off point of 1.58 cm³ was identified in the third trimester of pregnancy (AUC 0.865 (95% CI 0.789-0.940), sensitivity 76.3%, specificity 87.4%, LR+ 6.06, LR- 0.27) for measurements with SonoAVC. A cut-off value of 11.5 mm was established in the third trimester of pregnancy (AUC 0.828 (95% CI 0.737-0.918), sensitivity 71.1%, specificity 85.1%, LR+ 4.77, LR- 0.34) for the conventional AP measurement. A cut-off point for fetal kidney volume was calculated at 13.29 cm³ (AUC 0.769 (95% CI 0.657-0.881), sensitivity 71%, specificity 66%, LR+ 2.09, LR- 0.44). For renal parenchymal thickness, a cut-off point of 8.4 mm was established (AUC 0.216 (95% CI 0.117-0.315), sensitivity 31.6%, specificity 32.6%, LR+ 0.47, LR- 2.10).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that 3D fetal renal pelvis volume measurements and AP measurements both have a good and comparable diagnostic performance, fetal renal volume a fair accuracy and renal parenchymal thickness a poor accuracy in predicting postnatal renal outcome.
Keywords: Fetal renal pelvis; SonoAVC; hydronephrosis; pyelectasis.
Similar articles
-
Fetal hydronephrosis: does adding an extra parameter improve detection of neonatal uropathies?J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jul;25(7):920-3. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.600365. Epub 2011 Aug 16. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012. PMID: 21843111
-
Reproducibility of fetal renal pelvis volume assessed by three-dimensional ultrasonography with two different measurement techniques.J Clin Ultrasound. 2013 May;41(4):230-4. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22039. Epub 2013 Jan 17. J Clin Ultrasound. 2013. PMID: 23325421 Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of fetal renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter as a predictor of significant postnatal nephrouropathy: second versus third trimester of pregnancy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;194(1):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.071. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16389027
-
Prenatal diagnosis and management of hydronephrosis.Early Hum Dev. 2006 Jan;82(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.11.003. Epub 2005 Dec 27. Early Hum Dev. 2006. PMID: 16380224 Review.
-
[Management of isolated fetal dilatations of the kidney pelvis].Rev Med Brux. 2003 Feb;24(1):29-34. Rev Med Brux. 2003. PMID: 12666492 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Mild-to-moderate renal pelvis dilatation identified during pregnancy and hospital admissions in childhood: An electronic birth cohort study in Wales, UK.PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 30;16(7):e1002859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002859. eCollection 2019 Jul. PLoS Med. 2019. PMID: 31361739 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources