Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT
- PMID: 2643135
- DOI: 10.1148/radiology.170.2.2643135
Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT
Abstract
One hundred two consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment for rectal cancer were examined by means of endorectal ultrasound (US) for staging before surgery. Eighty-one of these patients also underwent staging with computed tomography (CT). The diagnostic sensitivity of endorectal US in detection of tumor extension into fat was 67%; specificity, 77%; positive predictive value, 73%; and negative predictive value, 72%. The sensitivity of CT for this finding was 53%; specificity, 53%; positive predictive value, 56%; and negative predictive value, 50%. The sensitivity of endorectal US in detection of lymph node infiltration was 50%; specificity, 92%; positive predictive value, 68%; and negative predictive value, 84%. For this finding the sensitivity and negative predictive value, 76%. These findings suggest that endorectal US may be as accurate as CT, or more so, in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Similar articles
-
Value and limits of endorectal ultrasonography for preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Dec;8(6):438-44. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998. PMID: 9864111 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of computed tomography and endorectal ultrasound in staging rectal cancer.Int J Colorectal Dis. 1986 Oct;1(4):219-23. doi: 10.1007/BF01648341. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1986. PMID: 3298493
-
How accurate is endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer?Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Feb;36(2):127-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02051167. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993. PMID: 8425415
-
The accuracy of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography, and computed tomography in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy: A metaanalysis.Surgery. 2016 Mar;159(3):688-99. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Nov 24. Surgery. 2016. PMID: 26619929 Review.
-
Preoperative imaging staging of rectal cancer.Dig Dis. 2007;25(1):20-32. doi: 10.1159/000099167. Dig Dis. 2007. PMID: 17384505 Review.
Cited by
-
The prognosis of rectal carcinoid tumours.Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992 Feb;7(1):11-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01647653. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992. PMID: 1588217
-
The learning curve for endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging.Surg Endosc. 2010 Dec;24(12):3054-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1085-z. Epub 2010 May 13. Surg Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20464422
-
Endorectal ultrasound for control of preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer.Ann Surg. 1993 Jan;217(1):64-71. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199301000-00011. Ann Surg. 1993. PMID: 8424703 Free PMC article.
-
Pelvic colorectal recurrence: crucial role of radiologists in oncologic and surgical treatment options.Cancer Imaging. 2011 Oct 3;11 Spec No A(1A):S103-11. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2011.9025. Cancer Imaging. 2011. PMID: 22186112 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improved accuracy of computed tomography in local staging of rectal cancer using water enema.Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;11(2):60-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00342461. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996. PMID: 8739828 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical