A standardized approach to estimating survival statistics for population-based cystic fibrosis registry cohorts
- PMID: 26434789
- PMCID: PMC4889445
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.026
A standardized approach to estimating survival statistics for population-based cystic fibrosis registry cohorts
Abstract
Objectives: Our objective was to quantify the effect of different statistical techniques, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and missing data on the predicted median survival age.
Study design and setting: Using the Canadian cystic fibrosis registry (CCFR), the median age of survival was calculated using both the Cox proportional hazards (PH) and the life-table methods. Through simulations, we examined how the median age of survival would change when: (1) patients were excluded, (2) death dates were inaccurate, (3) patients were lost to follow-up, (4) entire years with no clinic visits were excluded even if the patient had a visit in subsequent years, and (5) censoring patients at their date of transplant. Simulations were run assuming 5-35% of data were affected by each scenario.
Results: Over the period 2009-2013, there were 4,666 individuals in the CCFR with 240 deaths. The observed median age of survival calculated by the Cox PH method was 50.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 47.4, 54.3] and 50.5 from the life-table method (95% CI: 47.5, 53.5). Censoring patients at their transplant date overestimated the median age of survival by 7.2 years (58.1; 95% CI: 53.3, 64.7). Simulations determined that by missing just 15% of deaths, the median age of survival can be overestimated by 3.5 years (54.4; 95% CI: 54.2, 56.1), and having 25% of patients lost to follow-up can underestimate the median age of survival by 3.3 years (47.6; 95% CI: 46.8, 47.7).
Conclusion: We present several recommendations to assist national cystic fibrosis registries in calculating and reporting the median age of survival in a standardized fashion. It is imperative to state the statistical method used as well as the proportion lost to follow-up and the treatment of missing data and transplanted patients. Registries must be diligent in their data collection as incomplete data can lead to overestimation and underestimation of survival.
Keywords: Cox proportional hazards; Cystic fibrosis; International comparisons; Life tables; Registry; Survival.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Stephenson AL, Tom M, Berthiaume Y, Singer LG, Aaron SD, Whitmore GA, Stanojevic S. A contemporary survival analysis of individuals with cystic fibrosis: a cohort study. European Respiratory Journal. 2014 - PubMed
-
- Cystic Fibrosis: our focus. Cystic Fibrosis Trust; Kent: 2013. UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry Annual data report 2012.
-
- Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. 2012 Annual Data Report to the Center Directors. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; Bethesda, Maryland: 2013.
-
- Smith LK, Lambert PC, Botha JL, Jones DR. Providing more up-to-date estimates of patient survival: a comparison of standard survival analysis with period analysis using life-table methods and proportional hazards models. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2004;57:14–20. - PubMed
-
- Jackson AD, Daly L, Kelleher C, Marshall BC, Quinton HB, Foley L, Fitzpatrick P. The application of current lifetable methods to compare cystic fibrosis median survival internationally is limited. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 2011;10:62–65. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
