Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb:70:206-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Oct 3.

A standardized approach to estimating survival statistics for population-based cystic fibrosis registry cohorts

Affiliations

A standardized approach to estimating survival statistics for population-based cystic fibrosis registry cohorts

Jenna Sykes et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Our objective was to quantify the effect of different statistical techniques, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and missing data on the predicted median survival age.

Study design and setting: Using the Canadian cystic fibrosis registry (CCFR), the median age of survival was calculated using both the Cox proportional hazards (PH) and the life-table methods. Through simulations, we examined how the median age of survival would change when: (1) patients were excluded, (2) death dates were inaccurate, (3) patients were lost to follow-up, (4) entire years with no clinic visits were excluded even if the​ patient had a visit in subsequent years, and (5) censoring patients at their date of transplant. Simulations were run assuming 5-35% of data were affected by each scenario.

Results: Over the period 2009-2013, there were 4,666 individuals in the CCFR with 240 deaths. The observed median age of survival calculated by the Cox PH method was 50.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 47.4, 54.3] and 50.5 from the life-table method (95% CI: 47.5, 53.5). Censoring patients at their transplant date overestimated the median age of survival by 7.2 years (58.1; 95% CI: 53.3, 64.7). Simulations determined that by missing just 15% of deaths, the median age of survival can be overestimated by 3.5 years (54.4; 95% CI: 54.2, 56.1), and having 25% of patients lost to follow-up can underestimate the median age of survival by 3.3 years (47.6; 95% CI: 46.8, 47.7).

Conclusion: We present several recommendations to assist national cystic fibrosis registries in calculating and reporting the median age of survival in a standardized fashion. It is imperative to state the statistical method used as well as the proportion lost to follow-up and the treatment of missing data and transplanted patients. Registries must be diligent in their data collection as incomplete data can lead to overestimation and underestimation of survival.

Keywords: Cox proportional hazards; Cystic fibrosis; International comparisons; Life tables; Registry; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Median age of survival after randomly excluding 5–35% of cases for missing a date of diagnosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Median age of survival after randomly censoring 5–35% of deceased cases at date of death.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Median age of survival after randomly assigning 5–35% of patients to be lost to follow-up.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Median age of survival after randomly excluding between 1 to 5 intervening years for 5–35% of patients.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Median age of survival after randomly censoring 15% of deaths at their date of death and randomly assigning 5–35% of patients to be lost to follow-up.

References

    1. Stephenson AL, Tom M, Berthiaume Y, Singer LG, Aaron SD, Whitmore GA, Stanojevic S. A contemporary survival analysis of individuals with cystic fibrosis: a cohort study. European Respiratory Journal. 2014 - PubMed
    1. Cystic Fibrosis: our focus. Cystic Fibrosis Trust; Kent: 2013. UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry Annual data report 2012.
    1. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. 2012 Annual Data Report to the Center Directors. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; Bethesda, Maryland: 2013.
    1. Smith LK, Lambert PC, Botha JL, Jones DR. Providing more up-to-date estimates of patient survival: a comparison of standard survival analysis with period analysis using life-table methods and proportional hazards models. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2004;57:14–20. - PubMed
    1. Jackson AD, Daly L, Kelleher C, Marshall BC, Quinton HB, Foley L, Fitzpatrick P. The application of current lifetable methods to compare cystic fibrosis median survival internationally is limited. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 2011;10:62–65. - PubMed

Publication types