Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:802840.
doi: 10.1155/2015/802840. Epub 2015 Sep 7.

Calcification Characteristics of Low-Flow Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Affiliations

Calcification Characteristics of Low-Flow Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Barbara E Stähli et al. Cardiol Res Pract. 2015.

Abstract

Low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (LFLGAS) is associated with worse outcomes. Aortic valve calcification patterns of LFLGAS as compared to non-LFLGAS have not yet been thoroughly assessed. 137 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with preprocedural multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography were enrolled. Calcification characteristics were assessed by MDCT both for the total aortic valve and separately for each leaflet. 34 patients had LFLGAS and 103 non-LFLGAS. Total aortic valve calcification volume (p < 0.001), mass (p < 0.001), and density (p = 0.004) were lower in LFLGAS as compared to non-LFLGAS patients. At 30-day follow-up, mean transaortic pressure gradients and more than mild paravalvular regurgitation did not differ between groups. In conclusion, LFLGAS and non-LFLGAS express different calcification patterns which, however, did not impact on device success after TAVR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) analysis illustrating calcification measurements. (a) Centerline of the aortic root and the ascending aorta. (b), (c), and (d) Anchor points at the level of the insertion of the aortic leaflets. (e) Measurement of calcification volume and mass.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation in patients with low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (LFLGAS) and those with non-LFLGAS. (a) LFLGAS patients. (b) Non-LFLGAS patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Postprocedural symptomatic improvement in patients with low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (LFLGAS) and those with non-LFLGAS. (a) LFLGAS patients. (b) Non-LFLGAS patients. NYHA indicates New York Heart Association functional class. p ≤ 0.05 denotes a significant difference between patients with low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (LFLGAS) and those with non-LFLGAS.

References

    1. Stewart B. F., Siscovick D., Lind B. K., et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1997;29:630–634. - PubMed
    1. Nkomo V. T., Gardin J. M., Skelton T. N., Gottdiener J. S., Scott C. G., Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. The Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005–1011. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69208-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bach D. S., Cimino N., Deeb G. M. Unoperated patients with severe aortic stenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007;50(20):2018–2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leon M. B., Kodali S., Williams M., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with critical aortic stenosis: rationale, device descriptions, early clinical experiences, and perspectives. Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2006;18(2):165–174. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2006.08.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hachicha Z., Dumesnil J. G., Bogaty P., Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007;115(22):2856–2864. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources