Use of Clinical UV Chamber to Disinfect Dental Impressions: A Comparative Study
- PMID: 26436051
- PMCID: PMC4576645
- DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14025.6353
Use of Clinical UV Chamber to Disinfect Dental Impressions: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction: Dental impressions are potential source of infection in a prosthodontic practice. Risk of transmission of infection through saliva, blood etc is considered as hazard for both dentist as well as dental auxiliary staff. A number of methods are currently employed for disinfecting the impressions which are technique sensitive and time consuming. This study focuses on disinfecting impression using dental UV chamber which is commonly employed for storing sterilized instruments.
Aim: The aim of this invitro study was to evaluate the use of clinical UV chamber to disinfect various impression materials at different time intervals and its comparison with 2% glutaraldehyde using standard immersion technique.
Materials and methods: Total sample size of 180 specimens was taken from three different impression materials. The impressions were made from 30 dentulous subjects. A total of ten impressions were made for each impression material i.e. alginate, addition silicone and polyether impression material. Six punch samples were taken from each impression. Out of 6 punch sample, one was kept as control, second was disinfected by immersing in freshly prepared 2% glutaraldehyde solution for 10 minutes and remaining four were exposed to UV rays for 3 minutes, 6 minutes, 10 minutes and 15 minutes using dental UV chamber. Amount of disinfection achieved was evaluated by counting the colonies over the culture plates with the help of digital colony.
Results: The results showed that the mean CFUs for alginate were found to be i.e. 11797.40 ± 5989.73 (mean ± SD). The mean CFUs for addition silicone impression material was found 7095.40 with a standard deviation of 4268.83 and the mean CFUs for polyether impression material was found to be 2168.92 ± 1676 (mean ± SD).
Conclusion: For alginate and addition silicone impression material, disinfection was achieved on exposure to UV rays for a period of 10 minutes. However, for polyether impression material 3 minutes of exposure to UV rays was sufficient to cause complete disinfection.
Keywords: Cross contamination; Disinfection; Infection control; Pathogenic.
Figures
![[Table/Fig-1-12]:](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/966b/4576645/136e8913d7ca/jcdr-9-ZC67-g001.gif)
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the effect of chemical disinfection and ultraviolet disinfection on the dimensional stability of polyether impression material: an in-vitro study.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04188-8. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38622548 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.Int J Prosthodont. 2007 May-Jun;20(3):299-307. Int J Prosthodont. 2007. PMID: 17580464
-
Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Apr;79(4):446-53. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70160-x. J Prosthet Dent. 1998. PMID: 9576321
-
A survey of the methods of disinfection of dental impressions used in dental hospitals in the United Kingdom.Br Dent J. 1996 May 25;180(10):369-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809092. Br Dent J. 1996. PMID: 8652299 Review.
-
Disinfection Procedures and Their Effect on the Microorganism Colonization of Dental Impression Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;9(3):123. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9030123. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35324812 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Study on the effect of chlorogenic acid on the antimicrobial effect, physical properties and model accuracy of alginate impression materials.PeerJ. 2024 Oct 31;12:e18228. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18228. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 39494305 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and design requirements of UV light cabinets for disinfection of exchangeable non-sterilizable "dental objects".Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 13;13(1):19755. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45481-w. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37957167 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Disinfection efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and glutaraldehyde and their effects on the dimensional stability and surface properties of dental impressions: a systematic review.PeerJ. 2023 Feb 20;11:e14868. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14868. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 36846444 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital surface disinfection using ultraviolet germicidal irradiation technology: A review.Healthc Technol Lett. 2022 May 28;9(3):25-33. doi: 10.1049/htl2.12032. eCollection 2022 Jun. Healthc Technol Lett. 2022. PMID: 35662749 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S289-S292. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_755_20. Epub 2021 Jun 5. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021. PMID: 34447095 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Connor C. Cross contamination control in prosthodontic practice. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1991;4(4):337–44. - PubMed
-
- Owen PC. Disinfection of Impression Materials to Prevent Viral Cross Contamination: A Review and a Protocol. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1993;6(5):480–94. - PubMed
-
- Craig RG. Review of dental impression materials. Advances in Dental Research. 1998;2(l):51–64. - PubMed
-
- Jonson GH, Cheillis KD, Gordon GE, Lepe X. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1998;79:446–53. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources