A Multicenter Trial of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery
- PMID: 26436208
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1413579
A Multicenter Trial of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery
Abstract
Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is reported to reduce biomarkers of ischemic and reperfusion injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, but uncertainty about clinical outcomes remains.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving adults who were scheduled for elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass under total anesthesia with intravenous propofol. The trial compared upper-limb RIPC with a sham intervention. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or acute renal failure up to the time of hospital discharge. Secondary end points included the occurrence of any individual component of the primary end point by day 90.
Results: A total of 1403 patients underwent randomization. The full analysis set comprised 1385 patients (692 in the RIPC group and 693 in the sham-RIPC group). There was no significant between-group difference in the rate of the composite primary end point (99 patients [14.3%] in the RIPC group and 101 [14.6%] in the sham-RIPC group, P=0.89) or of any of the individual components: death (9 patients [1.3%] and 4 [0.6%], respectively; P=0.21), myocardial infarction (47 [6.8%] and 63 [9.1%], P=0.12), stroke (14 [2.0%] and 15 [2.2%], P=0.79), and acute renal failure (42 [6.1%] and 35 [5.1%], P=0.45). The results were similar in the per-protocol analysis. No treatment effect was found in any subgroup analysis. No significant differences between the RIPC group and the sham-RIPC group were seen in the level of troponin release, the duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of stay in the intensive care unit or the hospital, new onset of atrial fibrillation, and the incidence of postoperative delirium. No RIPC-related adverse events were observed.
Conclusions: Upper-limb RIPC performed while patients were under propofol-induced anesthesia did not show a relevant benefit among patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. (Funded by the German Research Foundation; RIPHeart ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01067703.).
Comment in
-
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Cardiac Surgery--Ineffective and Risky?N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 8;373(15):1470-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1510338. Epub 2015 Oct 5. N Engl J Med. 2015. PMID: 26436209 No abstract available.
-
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Cardiac Surgery.N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 4;374(5):491. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1514509. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 26840140 No abstract available.
-
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Cardiac Surgery.N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 4;374(5):489. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1514509. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 26840141 No abstract available.
-
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Cardiac Surgery.N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 4;374(5):490. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1514509. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 26840142 No abstract available.
-
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Cardiac Surgery.N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 4;374(5):490. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1514509. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 26840143 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical