Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Jan;30(1):57-64.
doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.270. Epub 2015 Oct 6.

Frontline nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: results from the European ENEST1st study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Frontline nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: results from the European ENEST1st study

A Hochhaus et al. Leukemia. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

The Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials as First-Line Treatment (ENEST1st) study included 1089 patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. The rate of deep molecular response (MR(4) (BCR-ABL1⩽0.01% on the International Scale or undetectable BCR-ABL1 with ⩾10,000 ABL1 transcripts)) at 18 months was evaluated as the primary end point, with molecular responses monitored by the European Treatment and Outcome Study network of standardized laboratories. This analysis was conducted after all patients had completed 24 months of study treatment (80.9% of patients) or discontinued early. In patients with typical BCR-ABL1 transcripts and ⩽3 months of prior imatinib therapy, 38.4% (404/1052) achieved MR(4) at 18 months. Six patients (0.6%) developed accelerated or blastic phase, and 13 (1.2%) died. The safety profile of nilotinib was consistent with that of previous studies, although the frequencies of some nilotinib-associated adverse events were lower (for example, rash, 21.4%). Ischemic cardiovascular events occurred in 6.0% of patients. Routine monitoring of lipid and glucose levels was not mandated in the protocol. These results support the use of frontline nilotinib, particularly when achievement of a deep molecular response (a prerequisite for attempting treatment-free remission in clinical trials) is a treatment goal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare the following relationships with pharmaceutical companies: Novartis—receipt of honoraria (AHo, GR, NC, JS, PlC, TM, LG, WWJ, DR, DC, TB, GS, MM, FXM, MB, FG), research funding (all authors), nonfinancial support (GR, WWJ, DC, TB), employment (PS, PDM, AP, LD) and stock ownership (PS); Pfizer—receipt of honoraria (AHo, GR, JS, PlC, DR, DC, TB, GS, FXM, MB), research funding (AHo, GR, JS, TB) and nonfinancial support (GR, TB); Ariad—receipt of honoraria (AHo, GR, NC, JS, PlC, DR, TB, GS, MM, FXM, MB), research funding (AHo, GR, JS, MM) and nonfinancial support (GR, TB); Bristol-Myers Squibb—receipt of honoraria (AHo, GR, JS, PlC, TM, DR, DC, TB, GS, MM, FXM, MB), research funding (AHo, GR, JS, MM) and nonfinancial support (GR, TB).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis populations. aThe original target enrollment of N=806 (determined using an approximation of a normal distribution to achieve a precision of 3.3% for the 95% CI of the primary end point, assuming an MR4 rate of 25% at 18 months, a discontinuation rate of 15% and a Philadelphia chromosome-negative and/or atypical BCR-ABL1 transcript prevalence of 5%) was increased to allow a more robust analysis of the study's exploratory results. ITT, intent to treat.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative molecular response rates. Raw cumulative incidence (95% CI) of (a) MMR (BCR-ABL1IS⩽0.1%), MR4 (BCR-ABL1IS⩽0.01%) and MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS⩽0.0032%) in the molecular analysis population (n=1052) and (b) MR4 according to European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) and Sokal risk scores at diagnosis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative molecular response rates according to 3-month BCR-ABL1IS. (a) Raw cumulative rates (95% CI) of MMR (BCR-ABL1IS⩽0.1%), (b) MR4 (BCR-ABL1IS⩽0.01%) and (c) MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS⩽0.0032%) among patients in the landmark analysis population (n=783) with BCR-ABL1IS⩽1%, >1–⩽10% and >10% at 3 months. Patients who had already achieved MMR, MR4 or MR4.5, respectively, at 3 months were excluded from the landmark analyses of MMR, MR4 and MR4.5 rates over time.

References

    1. 1Tasigna [package insert]. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: East Hanover, NJ, USA, 2015.
    1. 2Hughes TP, Saglio G, Kantarjian HM, Guilhot F, Niederwieser D, Rosti G et al. Early molecular response predicts outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with frontline nilotinib or imatinib. Blood 2014; 123: 1353–1360. - PMC - PubMed
    1. 3Larson RA, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Clark RE, Etienne G, Kim DW et al. Nilotinib vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 3-year follow-up. Leukemia 2012; 26: 2197–2203. - PubMed
    1. 4Kantarjian HM, Hochhaus A, Saglio G, De Souza C, Flinn IW, Stenke L et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, chronic myeloid leukaemia: 24-month minimum follow-up of the phase 3 randomised ENESTnd trial. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 841–851. - PubMed
    1. 5Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, le Coutre P, Etienne G, Lobo C et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 2251–2259. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms