Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep;17(3):268-81.
doi: 10.5853/jos.2015.17.3.268. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

Endovascular Recanalization Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Review

Endovascular Recanalization Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Keun-Sik Hong et al. J Stroke. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated benefits of endovascular recanalization therapy (ERT) contrary to earlier trials. We aimed to estimate the benefits of ERT added to standard therapy in acute ischemic stroke.

Methods: From a literature search of RCTs testing ERT, we performed a meta-analysis to estimate an overall efficacy and safety of ERT for all trials, stent-retriever trials, and RCTs comparing ERT and intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-TPA).

Results: We identified 15 relevant RCTs including 2,899 patients. For all trials, ERT was associated with increased good outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34, 2.40; P<0.001) compared to the control. ERT also increased no or minimal disability outcomes, good neurological recovery, good activity of daily living, and recanalization. ERT did not significantly increase symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.83, 1.69; P=0.345) or death (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.71, 1.05; P=0.151). In contrast, ERT significantly reduced extreme disability or death (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61, 0.97; P=0.025). Restricting to five stent-retriever trials comparing ERT plus IV-TPA vs. IV-TPA alone, the benefit was even greater for good outcome (OR 2.39; 95% CI 1.88, 3.04; P<0.001) and extreme disability or death (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.41, 0.78; P=0.001). Restricting to eight RCTs comparing ERT (plus IV-TPA in six trials) with IV-TPA alone showed similar efficacy and safety.

Conclusions: This updated meta-analysis shows that ERT substantially improves clinical outcomes and reduces extreme disability or death without significantly increasing SICH compared to standard therapy.

Keywords: Acute ischemic stroke; Intra-arterial; Meta-analysis; Thrombectomy; Thrombolysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Selection of studies for inclusion in the meta-analysis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Bias risk assessment for each trial.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Pooled estimates for achieving modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 outcomes with Endovascular recanalization therapy vs. control.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Pooled estimates for achieving modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1 outcome with Endovascular recanalization therapy vs. control.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Pooled estimates for achieving partial or complete recanalization with Endovascular recanalization therapy vs. control.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Pooled estimates for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) with Endovascular recanalization therapy vs. control.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Pooled estimates for mortality with Endovascular recanalization therapy vs. control.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Pooled estimates for bed-ridden or dead outcome (mRS 5-6) with Endovascular recanalization therapy vs. control.

References

    1. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–1587. - PubMed
    1. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Davalos A, Guidetti D, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1317–1329. - PubMed
    1. Riedel CH, Zimmermann P, Jensen-Kondering U, Stingele R, Deuschl G, Jansen O. The importance of size: successful recanalization by intravenous thrombolysis in acute anterior stroke depends on thrombus length. Stroke. 2011;42:1775–1777. - PubMed
    1. Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, Yeatts SD, Khatri P, Hill MD, et al. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:893–903. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee M, Hong KS, Saver JL. Efficacy of intra-arterial fibrinolysis for acute ischemic stroke: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke. 2010;41:932–937. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources