The Effects of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Cognition in Stroke Patients
- PMID: 26438001
- PMCID: PMC4635724
- DOI: 10.5853/jos.2015.17.3.354
The Effects of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Cognition in Stroke Patients
Abstract
Background and purpose: To investigate whether transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) can improve cognition in stroke patients.
Methods: Forty-five stroke patients (20 males and 25 females, average age: 62.7 years) with cognitive dysfunction were included in this prospective, double-blinded, randomized case-control study. All patients were right-handed and the mean elapsed time after stroke was 39.3 days. Three different treatments groups were used: (1) anodal stimulation of the left anterior temporal lobe, (2) anodal stimulation of the right anterior temporal lobe, and (3) sham stimulation. tDCS was delivered for 30 minutes at 2 mA with 25 cm(2) electrodes, five times/week, for a total of 3 weeks, using a Phoresor II Auto Model PM 850 (IOMED(®)). The evaluation of cognitive impairment was based on a Computerized Neuropsychological Test (CNT), Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE). The Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) was used to assess activities of daily living functionality. These evaluations were conducted in all patients before and after treatment.
Results: Each group included 15 patients. Pre-treatment evaluation showed no significant differences between the three groups for any of the parameters. There was significant improvement in the verbal learning test on the CNT in the left anodal stimulation group (P < 0.05). There were, however, no significant differences in the K-MMSE or K-MBI scores among the three groups.
Conclusions: These results demonstrated the beneficial effects of anodal tDCS on memory function. Thus, tDCS can successfully be used as a treatment modality for patients with cognitive dysfunction after stroke.
Keywords: Cognition; Stroke; Transcranial direct stimulation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Diamond PT, Felsenthal G, Macciocchi SN, Butler DH, Lally-Cassady D. Effect of cognitive impairment on rehabilitation outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;75:40–43. - PubMed
-
- Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Vataja R, Kaste M. Dementia three months after stroke. Baseline frequency and effect of different definitions of dementia in the Helsinki Stroke Aging Memory Study (SAM) cohort. Stroke. 1997;28:785–792. - PubMed
-
- Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:681–687. - PubMed
-
- Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Mayeux R, Paik M, Stern Y, Sano M, et al. Dementia after stroke: baseline frequency, risks, and clinical features in a hospitalized cohort. Neurology. 1992;42:1185–1193. - PubMed
-
- Kim YH, Jang EH, Lee SJ, Park JW, Ko MH, Park SH, et al. Development of computer-assisted memory rehabilitation programs for the treatment of memory dysfunction in patients with brain injury. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 2003;27:667–674.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
