Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;94(1):236-42.
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0400. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

Hospital-Based Surveillance for Infectious Etiologies Among Patients with Acute Febrile Illness in Georgia, 2008-2011

Affiliations

Hospital-Based Surveillance for Infectious Etiologies Among Patients with Acute Febrile Illness in Georgia, 2008-2011

Tinatin Kuchuloria et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Information on the infectious causes of undifferentiated acute febrile illness (AFI) in Georgia is essential for effective treatment and prevention. In May 2008, a hospital-based AFI surveillance was initiated at six hospitals in Georgia. Patients aged ≥ 4 years with fever ≥ 38°C for ≥ 48 hours were eligible for surveillance. Blood culture and serologic testing were conducted for Leptospira spp., Brucella spp., West Nile virus (WNV), Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, Coxiella burnetii, tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), hantavirus, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi), and Rickettsia typhi. Of 537 subjects enrolled, 70% were outpatients, 54% were males, and the mean age was 37 years. Patients reported having fatigue (89%), rigors (87%), sweating (83%), pain in joints (49%), and sleep disturbances (42%). Thirty-nine (7%) patients were seropositive for R. typhi, 37 (7%) for Brucella spp., 36 (7%) for TBEV, 12 (2%) for Leptospira spp., 10 (2%) for C. burnetii, and three (0.6%) for S. Typhi. None of the febrile patients tested positive for WNV antibodies. Of the patients, 73% were negative for all pathogens. Our results indicate that most of the targeted pathogens are present in Georgia, and highlight the importance of enhancing laboratory capacity for these infectious diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Map of Georgia.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lo Re V, 3rd, Gluckman SJ. Fever in the returned traveler. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68:1343–1350. - PubMed
    1. Gamkrelidze A, Atun R, Gotsadze G, MacLehose L. Healthcare Systems in Transition: Georgia. Vol. 4. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Observatory on Health Care Systems; 2002. pp. 1–72.
    1. Sakvarelidze LA, Nersesov VA, Maskharashvili PA. Complex method for epizootiological and epidemiological surveillance. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 1985;10:51–54. - PubMed
    1. Ivanidze EA, Sakvarelidze LA, Tkachenko EA, Rezapkin GV, Dzagurova TK. Detection of natural foci of the hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in the Georgian SSR. Vopr Virusol. 1987;32:607–610. - PubMed
    1. Chitadze N, Kuchuloria T, Clark D, Tsertsvadze E, Chokheli M, Tsertsvadze N, Trapaidze N, Lane A, Bakanidze L, Tsanava S. Water-borne outbreak of oropharyngeal and glandular tularemia in Georgia: investigation and follow-up. Infection. 2009;37:514–521. - PubMed

Publication types