Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct 5;5(12):a023150.
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a023150.

Potential Uses and Inherent Challenges of Using Genome-Scale Sequencing to Augment Current Newborn Screening

Affiliations
Review

Potential Uses and Inherent Challenges of Using Genome-Scale Sequencing to Augment Current Newborn Screening

Jonathan S Berg et al. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. .

Abstract

Since newborn screening (NBS) began in the 1960s, technological advances have enabled its expansion to include an increasing number of disorders. Recent developments now make it possible to sequence an infant's genome relatively quickly and economically. Clinical application of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing is expanding at a rapid pace but presents many challenges. Its utility in NBS has yet to be demonstrated and its application in the pediatric population requires examination, not only for potential clinical benefits, but also for the unique ethical challenges it presents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Milestones in newborn screening are depicted in the lower portion of the figure, with approximate dates on the horizontal axis. The number of conditions screened for (or potentially screened for) is depicted chronologically with asterisks on the vertical axis, plotted on a logarithmic scale. Screening programs have historically differed between states, most dramatically observed after development of tandem mass-spectrometry technology in the 1990s. Adoption of a recommended uniform screening panel in 2005–2006 has gradually led to greater consistency. Development of next-generation sequencing technology in the early 2000s, with subsequent reduction in the cost of genome-scale sequencing, makes it possible to analyze thousands of disease genes. The number of conditions potentially screened for is indicated with a question mark to emphasize the substantial concerns regarding the application of such technology in healthy newborns.

References

    1. AAP, Committee on Bioethics. 2001. Ethical issues with genetic testing in pediatrics. Pediatrics 107: 1451–1455. Reaffirmed October 2004. - PubMed
    1. ACMG Newborn Screening Expert Group. 2006. Newborn screening: Toward a uniform screening panel and system—Executive summary. Pediatrics 117: S296–S307. - PubMed
    1. Alexander D, van Dyck PC. 2006. A vision of the future of newborn screening. Pediatrics 117: S350–S354. - PubMed
    1. Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Déry V. 2008. Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: A review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ 86: 317–319. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ASHG Board of Directors, ACMG Board of Directors. 1995. Points to consider: Ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet 57: 1233–1241. - PMC - PubMed