Effectiveness and Cost of Bidirectional Text Messaging for Adolescent Vaccines and Well Care
- PMID: 26438703
- PMCID: PMC5848090
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-1089
Effectiveness and Cost of Bidirectional Text Messaging for Adolescent Vaccines and Well Care
Erratum in
-
O'Leary ST, Lee M, Lockhart S, et al. Effectiveness and Cost of Bidirectional Text Messaging for Adolescent Vaccines and Well Care. Pediatrics. 2015;136(5):e20151089.Pediatrics. 2016 Sep;138(3):e20161768. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1768. Pediatrics. 2016. PMID: 27581853 No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost of bidirectional short messaging service in increasing rates of vaccination and well child care (WCC) among adolescents.
Methods: We included all adolescents needing a recommended adolescent vaccine (n = 4587) whose parents had a cell-phone number in 5 private and 2 safety-net pediatric practices. Adolescents were randomized to intervention (n = 2228) or control (n = 2359). Parents in the intervention group received up to 3 personalized short messaging services with response options 1 (clinic will call to schedule), 2 (parent will call clinic), or STOP (no further short messaging service). Primary outcomes included completion of all needed services, WCC only, all needed vaccinations, any vaccination, and missed opportunity for vaccination.
Results: Intervention patients were more likely to complete all needed services (risk ratio [RR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.53), all needed vaccinations (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.50), and any vaccination (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.20-1.54). Seventy-five percent of control patients had a missed opportunity versus 69% of intervention (P = .002). There was not a significant difference for WCC visits. Responding that the clinic should call to schedule ("1") was associated with the highest effect size for completion of all needed services (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.41-2.54). Net cost ranged from $855 to $3394 per practice.
Conclusions: Bidirectional short messaging service to parents was effective at improving rates for all adolescent vaccinations and for all needed services, especially among parents who responded they desired a call from the practice.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01577979.
Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Szilagyi P, Vann J, Bordley C, et al. Interventions aimed at improving immunization rates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(4):CD003941. - PubMed
-
- Rand CM, Shone LP, Albertin C, Auinger P, Klein JD, Szilagyi PG. National health care visit patterns of adolescents: implications for delivery of new adolescent vaccines. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(3):252–259. - PubMed
-
- Akinsanya-Beysolow I, Jenkins R, Meissner HC ACIP Childhood/Adolescent Immunization Work Group; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended immunization schedule for persons aged 0 through 18 years—United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013;62(suppl 1):2–8. - PubMed
-
- Elam-Evans LD, Yankey D, Jeyarajah J, et al. Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years—United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(29):625–633. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
