Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep 16:6:1403.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01403. eCollection 2015.

The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping

Affiliations
Review

The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping

Kayla D Stone et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

This review aims to provide a comprehensive outlook on the sensory (visual and haptic) contributions to reaching and grasping. The focus is on studies in developing children, normal, and neuropsychological populations, and in sensory-deprived individuals. Studies have suggested a right-hand/left-hemisphere specialization for visually guided grasping and a left-hand/right-hemisphere specialization for haptically guided object recognition. This poses the interesting possibility that when vision is not available and grasping relies heavily on the haptic system, there is an advantage to use the left hand. We review the evidence for this possibility and dissect the unique contributions of the visual and haptic systems to grasping. We ultimately discuss how the integration of these two sensory modalities shape hand preference.

Keywords: development; hand preference; handedness; haptically guided; haptics; sensorimotor integration; sensory deprivation; visually guided.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Experimental set-up and results from Stone and Gonzalez (2014a,b, 2015a,b). Photographs of participants completing (A) the Vision/Haptics condition (B) the Vision/Constrained-Haptics condition (note that the participant is wearing a pair of gloves) and (C) the No Vision/Haptics condition (note that the participant is wearing a blindfold) (D) Graph demonstrating right-hand use for grasping in percentage for the three sensory conditions in children and adults. White bars represent the Vision/Haptics condition. Gray bars represent the Vision/Constrained-Haptics condition. Black bars represent the No Vision/Haptics condition. The gray dashed line denotes 50% right-hand use (or equal use of each hand). Note the significant difference within sensory conditions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adam J. J., Muskens R., Hoonhorst S., Pratt J., Fischer M. H. (2010).Left hand, but not right hand, reaching is sensitive to visual context. Exp. Brain Res. 203 227–232. 10.1007/s00221-010-2214-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amedi A., Malach R., Hendler T., Peled S., Zohary E. (2001). Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nat. Neurosci. 4 324–330. 10.1038/85201 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amedi A., Stern W. M., Camprodon J. A., Bermpohl F., Merabet L., Rotman S., et al. (2007). Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex. Nat. Neurosci. 10 687–689. 10.1038/nn1912 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews K., Fitzgerald M. (1994). The cutaneous withdrawal reflex in human neonates: sensitization, receptive fields, and the effects of contralateral stimulation. Pain 56 95–101. 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90154-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Argyropoulos V., Sideridis G. D., Papadimitriou V. (2014). Hand preference of individuals with blindness in everyday activities: the effects of age of sight loss, age, and gender. Res. Dev. Disabil. 35 1885–1898. 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.027 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources