Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 23:6:1406.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01406. eCollection 2015.

The use of personalized behavioral feedback for online gamblers: an empirical study

Affiliations

The use of personalized behavioral feedback for online gamblers: an empirical study

Michael M Auer et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Over the last few years, online gambling has become a more common leisure time activity. However, for a small minority, the activity can become problematic. Consequently, the gambling industry has started to acknowledge their role in player protection and harm minimization and some gambling companies have introduced responsible gambling tools as a way of helping players stay in control. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of mentor (a responsible gambling tool that provides personalized feedback to players) among 1,015 online gamblers at a European online gambling site, and compared their behavior with matched controls (n = 15,216) on the basis of age, gender, playing duration, and theoretical loss (i.e., the amount of money wagered multiplied by the payout percentage of a specific game played). The results showed that online gamblers receiving personalized feedback spent significantly less time and money gambling compared to controls that did not receive personalized feedback. The results suggest that responsible gambling tools providing personalized feedback may help the clientele of gambling companies gamble more responsibly, and may be of help those who gamble excessively to stay within their personal time and money spending limits.

Keywords: harm minimization; player protection; player tracking; problem gambling; responsible gambling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Illustration of ‘time played’ information in the feedback system as seen by a hypothetical player.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Information message sent to players about the feedback system.

References

    1. Afifi T. O., LaPlante D. A., Taillieu T. L., Dowd D., Shaffer H. J. (2014). Gambling involvement: considering frequency of play and the moderating effects of gender and age. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 12 283–294. 10.1007/s11469-013-9452-3 - DOI
    1. Auer M., Griffiths M. D. (2013a). Voluntary limit setting and player choice in most intense online gamblers: an empirical study of gambling behaviour. J. Gambl. Stud. 29 647–660. 10.1007/s10899-012-9332-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auer M., Griffiths M. D. (2013b). An empirical investigation of theoretical loss and gambling intensity. J. Gambl. Stud. 10.1007/s10899-013-9376-7 [Epub ahead of print]. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auer M., Griffiths M. D. (2015). Testing normative and self-appraisal feedback in an online slot-machine pop-up message in a real-world setting. Front. Psychol. 6:339 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00339 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auer M., Malischnig D., Griffiths M. D. (2014). Is ‘pop-up’ messaging in online slot machine gambling effective as a responsible gambling strategy? An empirical re-search note. J. Gambl. Issues 29 1–10. 10.4309/jgi.2014.29.3 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources