Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep 14:6:722.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00722. eCollection 2015.

Inter-organismal signaling and management of the phytomicrobiome

Affiliations
Review

Inter-organismal signaling and management of the phytomicrobiome

Donald L Smith et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

The organisms of the phytomicrobiome use signal compounds to regulate aspects of each other's behavior. Legumes use signals (flavonoids) to regulate rhizobial nod gene expression during establishment of the legume-rhizobia N2-fixation symbiosis. Lipochitooligosaccharides (LCOs) produced by rhizobia act as return signals to the host plant and are recognized by specific lysine motif receptor like kinases, which triggers a signal cascade leading to nodulation of legume roots. LCOs also enhance plant growth, particularly when plants are stressed. Chitooligosaccharides activate plant immune responses, providing enhanced resistance against diseases. Co-inoculation of rhizobia with other plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can improve nodulation and crop growth. PGPR also alleviate plant stress by secreting signal compounds including phytohormones and antibiotics. Thuricin 17, a small bacteriocin produced by a phytomicrobiome member promotes plant growth. Lumichrome synthesized by soil rhizobacteria function as stress-sensing cues. Inter-organismal signaling can be used to manage/engineer the phytomicrobiome to enhance crop productivity, particularly in the face of stress. Stressful conditions are likely to become more frequent and more severe because of climate change.

Keywords: crop productivity; inter-organismal signals; phytomicrobiome; plant agriculture; plant stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahuja I., Kissen R., Bones A. M. (2012). Phytoalexins in defense against pathogens. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 73–90. 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.11.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aslam S., Newman M., Erbs G., Morrissey K. (2008). Bacterial polysaccharides suppress induced innate immunity by calcium chelation. Curr. Biol. 18, 1078–1083. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.061 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakker P. A. H. M., Berendsen R. L., Doornbos R. F., Wintermans P. C. A., Pieterse C. M. J. (2013). The rhizosphere revisited: root microbiomics. Front. Plant Sci. 4:165. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00165 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell T. H., Joly S., Pitre F. E., Yergeau E. (2014). Increasing phytoremediation efficiency and reliability using novel omics approaches. Trends. Biotechnol. 32, 271–280. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.02.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonfante P., Requena N. (2011). Dating in the dark: how roots respond to fungal signals to establish arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14, 451–457. 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.014 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources