Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;38(12):715-9.
doi: 10.1002/clc.22477. Epub 2015 Oct 7.

Natural History and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation After Revascularization for Stable Coronary Artery Disease With Depressed Ejection Fraction

Affiliations

Natural History and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation After Revascularization for Stable Coronary Artery Disease With Depressed Ejection Fraction

Geoffrey F Lewis et al. Clin Cardiol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Following revascularization, most payors require 3 months of medical therapy, followed by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reassessment, before implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation possibly contributing to incomplete follow-up and suboptimal utilization of ICD therapy. The natural history of these patients, and their fate regarding ICD implantation, is unknown.

Hypothesis: We hypothesized that a waiting period after revascularization for stable CAD results in missed opportunities to provide care with regard to ICD implantation.

Methods: We followed patients with LVEF ≤ 35% and no ICD who underwent revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) for stable CAD. Follow-up used chart review and scripted telephone interviews.

Results: Among 3164 revascularized patients (2198 [69%] PCI, 966 [31%] CABG), only 62 (2%; 33 [53%] male, age 67 ± 12 y, LVEF 28% ± 6%) had stable CAD, depressed LVEF, and no ICD. Over 35 ± 19 months, 35 (56%) of these 62 patients were no longer candidates for ICD based on improved LVEF, 14 (23%) received an ICD, 5 (8%) declined ICD despite physician recommendation, 3 (5%) were not offered ICD despite continued eligibility, 2 (3%) died, 1 (2%) was not a candidate due to substance abuse, and 1 (2%) had ICD implantation temporarily deferred. Only 1 (2%) was lost to follow-up.

Conclusions: Following revascularization for stable CAD with depressed LVEF, ≥50% of patients' ventricular function improved enough to make ICD implantation unnecessary. A waiting period after revascularization prior to ICD implantation appears appropriate and does not significantly negatively impact follow-up or the rate of appropriate ICD implantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ICD‐related status on follow‐up of patients who underwent revascularization for stable CAD and depressed LV systolic function. Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; EF, ejection fraction; ICD, implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator; LV, left ventricular.

References

    1. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WF, et al; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:877–883. - PubMed
    1. Bardy GH, Lee DL, Mark DB, et al; Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD‐HeFT) Investigators. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator for congestive heart failure [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2146]. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:225–237. - PubMed
    1. Bigger JT Jr, et al; Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Patch Trial Investigators. Prophylactic use of implanted cardioverter‐defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1569–1575. - PubMed
    1. Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Dorian P et al; DINAMIT Investigators. Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2481–2488. - PubMed
    1. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device‐based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e6–e75. - PubMed