Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct 6;5(10):e008187.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008187.

Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students?

Affiliations

Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students?

Samy A Azer et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate accuracy of content and readability level of English Wikipedia articles on cardiovascular diseases, using quality and readability tools.

Methods: Wikipedia was searched on the 6 October 2013 for articles on cardiovascular diseases. Using a modified DISCERN (DISCERN is an instrument widely used in assessing online resources), articles were independently scored by three assessors. The readability was calculated using Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. The inter-rater agreement between evaluators was calculated using the Fleiss κ scale.

Results: This study was based on 47 English Wikipedia entries on cardiovascular diseases. The DISCERN scores had a median=33 (IQR=6). Four articles (8.5%) were of good quality (DISCERN score 40-50), 39 (83%) moderate (DISCERN 30-39) and 4 (8.5%) were poor (DISCERN 10-29). Although the entries covered the aetiology and the clinical picture, there were deficiencies in the pathophysiology of diseases, signs and symptoms, diagnostic approaches and treatment. The number of references varied from 1 to 127 references; 25.9±29.4 (mean±SD). Several problems were identified in the list of references and citations made in the articles. The readability of articles was 14.3±1.7 (mean±SD); consistent with the readability level for college students. In comparison, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 18th edition had more tables, less references and no significant difference in number of graphs, images, illustrations or readability level. The overall agreement between the evaluators was good (Fleiss κ 0.718 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.83).

Conclusions: The Wikipedia entries are not aimed at a medical audience and should not be used as a substitute to recommended medical resources. Course designers and students should be aware that Wikipedia entries on cardiovascular diseases lack accuracy, predominantly due to errors of omission. Further improvement of the Wikipedia content of cardiovascular entries would be needed before they could be considered a supplementary resource.

Keywords: MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative frequency graph (Ogive) for updates of the 47 Wikipedia entries on cardiovascular diseases.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between the DISCERN score and total number of article updates for Wikipedia cardiovascular articles.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation between number of article pages and the number of article updates for Wikipedia cardiovascular articles.

References

    1. Gaitsgory O, Burgess A, Mellis C. Opinion piece: ‘Medical students—learning from textbooks or electronic media?’ J Paediatr Child Health 2013;49:E370–2. 10.1111/jpc.12180 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kingsley K, Galbraith GM, Herring M et al. . Why not just Google it? An assessment of information literacy skills in a biomedical science curriculum. BMC Med Educ 2011;25:11–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29:173–80. 10.1007/s00276-007-0180-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frambach JM, Driessen EW, Chan LC et al. . Rethinking the globalisation of problem-based learning: how culture challenges self-directed learning. Med Educ 2012;46:738–47. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04290.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sandars J. Technology and the delivery of the curriculum of the future: opportunities and challenges. Med Teach 2012;34:534–8. 10.3109/0142159X.2012.671560 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types