Maternal Recall Error in Retrospectively Reported Time-to-Pregnancy: an Assessment and Bias Analysis
- PMID: 26443987
- PMCID: PMC4651209
- DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12245
Maternal Recall Error in Retrospectively Reported Time-to-Pregnancy: an Assessment and Bias Analysis
Abstract
Background: Epidemiologic studies of fecundability often use retrospectively measured time-to-pregnancy (TTP), thereby introducing potential for recall error. Little is known about how recall error affects the bias and precision of the fecundability odds ratio (FOR) in such studies.
Methods: Using data from the Danish Snart-Gravid Study (2007-12), we quantified error for TTP recalled in the first trimester of pregnancy relative to prospectively measured TTP among 421 women who enrolled at the start of their pregnancy attempt and became pregnant within 12 months. We defined recall error as retrospectively measured TTP minus prospectively measured TTP. Using linear regression, we assessed mean differences in recall error by maternal characteristics. We evaluated the resulting bias in the FOR and 95% confidence interval (CI) using simulation analyses that compared corrected and uncorrected retrospectively measured TTP values.
Results: Recall error (mean = -0.11 months, 95% CI -0.25, 0.04) was not appreciably associated with maternal age, gravidity, or recent oral contraceptive use. Women with TTP > 2 months were more likely to underestimate their TTP than women with TTP ≤ 2 months (unadjusted mean difference in error: -0.40 months, 95% CI -0.71, -0.09). FORs of recent oral contraceptive use calculated from prospectively measured, retrospectively measured, and corrected TTPs were 0.82 (95% CI 0.67, 0.99), 0.74 (95% CI 0.61, 0.90), and 0.77 (95% CI 0.62, 0.96), respectively.
Conclusions: Recall error was small on average among pregnancy planners who became pregnant within 12 months. Recall error biased the FOR of recent oral contraceptive use away from the null by 10%. Quantitative bias analysis of the FOR can help researchers quantify the bias from recall error.
Keywords: Bias (Epidemiology); Cohort Studies; Fertility Determinants.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Figures


References
-
- Baird DD, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR. Use of time to pregnancy to study environmental exposures. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1986;124:470–80. - PubMed
-
- Olsen J, Melbye M, Olsen SF, Sorensen TI, Aaby P, Andersen AM, et al. The Danish National Birth Cohort--its background, structure and aim. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2001;29:300–7. - PubMed
-
- Magnus P, Irgens LM, Haug K, Nystad W, Skjaerven R, Stoltenberg C. Cohort profile: the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) International Journal of Epidemiology. 2006;35:1146–50. - PubMed
-
- Baird DD, Weinberg CR, Rowland AS. Reporting errors in time-to-pregnancy data collected with a short questionnaire. Impact on power and estimation of fecundability ratios. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1991;133:1282–90. - PubMed
-
- Zielhuis GA, Hulscher ME, Florack EI. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire on fecundability. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1992;21:1151–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources