Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Dec;60(8):881-90.
doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0740-5. Epub 2015 Oct 7.

Breast cancer screening in England and the United States: a comparison of provision and utilisation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Breast cancer screening in England and the United States: a comparison of provision and utilisation

Joseph Williams et al. Int J Public Health. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Comparing breast cancer screening across countries within the context of some of the benefits and harms offers the opportunity to improve effectiveness through mutual learning.

Methods: This paper describes the provision of breast cancer screening in England and the United States. The various recommendations for accessing breast cancer screening in the two countries are set out and the organisation of services including quality assurance, incentives and performance mechanisms considered.

Results: In the United States, younger women are routinely screened; they are less likely to benefit and more likely to be harmed. The utilisation of breast cancer screening amongst eligible women is broadly comparable in the two countries. However, there are differences in technical performance; the reasons for these including radiological reading procedures and cultural factors are explored.

Conclusions: Despite a well-functioning screening programme, breast cancer mortality and survival in England are poor relative to other countries. Emphasis for American improvement should be on reducing false-positive recall rates, while the English NHS could supplement existing efforts to understand and improve comparatively poor survival and mortality.

Keywords: Breast cancer; England; Mammography; Screening; United States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations: None of the authors declared any conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Raffle AE and Gray JAM, Screening: Evidence and Practice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007
    1. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer, JAMA, 2005, 1245–56 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tabar et al. Swedish Two-County Trial: Impact of Mammographic Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality during 3 Decades, 2011 - PubMed
    1. Department of Health, Public health functions to be exercised by NHS England, Service specification No.24: Breast Screening Programme, 2013. accessed at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil... on 30th October 2014
    1. NHS Breast Cancer Screening Programme, Age Extension Full Randomised Control Trial, 2010. accessed at http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/research-age-extension-fu... on 10th August 2014

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources