Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul 28:4:409.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6858.2. eCollection 2015.

What's in a Name? Exploring the Nomenclature of Science Communication in the UK

Affiliations

What's in a Name? Exploring the Nomenclature of Science Communication in the UK

Sam Illingworth et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

This study, via a consideration of the literature, and a limited survey of active science communicators, presents concise and workable definitions for science outreach, public engagement, widening participation, and knowledge exchange, in a UK context. Sixty-six per cent of participants agreed that their definitions of outreach, public engagement, and widening participation aligned with those of their colleagues, whilst 64% felt that their personal definitions matched those of their institute. However, closer inspection of the open-ended questions found the respondents often differed in the use of the nomenclature. In particular, the respondents found it difficult to define knowledge exchange in this context. It is hoped that this initial study will form the foundation of future work in this area, and that it will help to further develop the debate regarding the need for a consistent nomenclature across science communication.

Keywords: Knowledge Exchange; Outreach; Public Engagement; Science Communication; Widening Participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare that there are no competing interests, either financial or otherwise.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Stacked columns showing how participant’s personal definitions differed from those of their colleagues and institutes/companies.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Major categories for ‘definitions of outreach’ and frequencies; listed in alphabetical order and colour coded according to frequency.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Major categories for ‘definitions of public engagement’ and frequencies; listed in alphabetical order and colour coded according to frequency.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Major categories for ‘definitions of widening participation’ and frequencies; listed in alphabetical order and colour coded according to frequency.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Major categories for ‘how knowledge exchange is related to outreach, public engagement and widening participation?’ and frequencies; listed in alphabetical order and colour coded according to frequency.

References

    1. Andrews E, Weaver A, Hanley D, et al. : Scientists and public outreach: Participation, motivations, and impediments. Journal of Geoscience Education. 2005;53(3):281–293. Reference Source
    1. Bowler MT, Buchanan-Smith HM, Whiten A: Assessing public engagement with science in a university primate research centre in a national zoo. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34505. 10.1371/journal.pone.0034505 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burns TW, O’Connor DJ, Stocklmayer SM: Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Underst Sci. 2003;12(2):183–202. 10.1177/09636625030122004 - DOI
    1. Clewell BC, Villegas AM: Creating a nontraditional pipeline for urban teachers: The pathways to teaching careers model. J Negro Educ. 1999;68(3):306–317. 10.2307/2668103 - DOI
    1. Cohen ER, Masum H, Berndtson K, et al. : Public engagement on global health challenges. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:168. 10.1186/1471-2458-8-168 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources