Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1989 Feb;209(2):131-48.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-198902000-00001.

Current status of proximal gastric vagotomy

Affiliations
Review

Current status of proximal gastric vagotomy

B D Schirmer. Ann Surg. 1989 Feb.

Abstract

Proximal gastric vagotomy is nearing its twentieth year in clinical use as an operation for peptic ulcer disease. No other acid-reducing operation has undergone as much scrutiny or study. At this time, the evidence of such studies and long-term follow-up strongly supports the use of proximal gastric vagotomy as the treatment of choice for chronic duodenal ulcer in patients who have failed medical therapy. Its application in treating the complications of peptic ulcer disease, which recently have come to represent an increasingly greater percentage of all operations done for peptic ulcer disease, is well-tested. However, initial series suggest that it should probably occupy a prominent role in treating some of these complications, particularly in selected patients, in the future. The operation has the well-documented ability to reduce gastric acid production, not inhibit gastric bicarbonate production, and also minimally inhibit gastric motility. The combination of these physiologic results after proximal gastric vagotomy, along with preservation of the normal antropyloroduodenal mechanism of gastrointestinal control, serve to allow patients with proximal gastric vagotomy the improved benefits of significantly fewer severe gastrointestinal side effects than are seen after other operations for peptic ulcer disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Surg. 1985 Feb;149(2):236-43 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 5;317(19):1200-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1982 May;195(5):653-61 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1977 Feb;72(2):212-4 - PubMed
    1. Gut. 1971 Dec;12(12):963-7 - PubMed