Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;23(12):585-91.
doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0760-z.

Yearly hypertension screening in women with a history of pre-eclampsia: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Affiliations

Yearly hypertension screening in women with a history of pre-eclampsia: a cost-effectiveness analysis

J T Drost et al. Neth Heart J. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Women with a history of preeclampsia are at increased risk for future hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD); until now it is not clear whether preventive measures are needed.

Methods: A decision-analytic Markov model was constructed to evaluate healthcare costs and effects of screening and treatment (100 % compliance) for hypertension post preeclampsia based on the available literature. Cardiovascular events and CVD mortality were defined as health states. Outcomes were measured in absolute costs, events, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Sensitivity and threshold analyses were performed to address uncertainty.

Results: Over a 20-year time horizon, events occurred in 7.2 % of the population after screening, and in 8.5 % of the population without screening. QALYs increased from 16.37 (no screening strategy) to 16.40 (screening strategy), an increment of 0.03 (95 % CI 0.01;0.05) QALYs. Total expected costs were € 8016 in the screening strategy, and € 9087 in the none screening strategy (expected saving of € 1071 (95 % CI - 3146;-87) per person).

Conclusion: Annual hypertension screening and treatment in women with a history of preeclampsia may save costs, for at least a similar quality of life and survival due to prevented CVD compared with standard care.

Keywords: Cardiovascular screening; Economic analysis; Preeclampsia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic representation of the Markov model.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effectiveness of screening for hypertension post preeclampsia according to the probabilistic analysis in 20 year time horizon
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for hypertension screenig in women post preeclampsia, combined results for 10 and 20 year time horizon

References

    1. Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;335:974–7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.385301.BE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Von Dadelszen P, Magee LA, Roberts JM. Subclassification of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2003;22:143–8. doi: 10.1081/PRG-120021060. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonald SD, Malinowski A, Zhou Q, Yusuf S, Devereaux PJ. Cardiovascular sequelae of preeclampsia/eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Am Heart J. 2008;156:918–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown MC, Best KE, Pearce MS, Waugh J, Robson SC, Bell R. Cardiovascular disease risk in women with preeclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28:1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9762-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women—2011 update a guideline from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:1243–62. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820faaf8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources