Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 Feb;78(1):57-68.
doi: 10.1017/s0022172400055935.

Prevalence of antibody to hepatitits B surface antigen among staff in an Edinburgh hospital

Prevalence of antibody to hepatitits B surface antigen among staff in an Edinburgh hospital

C J Burrell et al. J Hyg (Lond). 1977 Feb.

Abstract

Antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen was detected by radioimmunoprecipitation in 74 (5-5%) of 1336 staff members in a large general hospital in Edinburgh, in 14 (2-9%) of 480 volunteer blood donors in the area, and in 12 (6-1%) of 197 pregnant women attending for the first time at the ante-natal clinic in the hospital. Rates of antibody prevalence rose with age in the sample of hospital staff and in that of the blood donors, particularly among males. On the other hand, in the ante-natal patients antibody prevalence declined with age. The rates in hospital staff were higher than those in blood donors of comparable age and sex, and high titres of antibody were more common in the staff group. However, no association was found between antibody prevalence and a history of clinical hepatitis, blood transfusion, or recognized contact with cases of hepatitis. Staff who had previously worked in an infectious disease hospital did not show increased antibody prevalence, indicating that simple isolation measures have been adequate to minimize exposure to hepatitis B. No particular prevalence of infection was seen in physicians and surgeons, in the nursing staff, or in workers in clinical diagnostic laboratories, hospital administration or other areas. One group clearly showing increased antibody prevalence was staff currently working, or who had worked, in the Haemodialysis Unit; this correlated with the outbreak of dialysis-associated hepatitis in 1969--70. However, no evidence suggested that significant dissemination of infection had occurred to other defined groups of hospital staff. Elevated rates were also observed in a small sample of kitchen and portering staff, and in obstetric medical and nursing staff; the latter observation indicate a need for further investigation to identify unsuspected exposure to hepatitis B virus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1975 Jan;101(1):59-64 - PubMed
    1. J Am Med Assoc. 1950 Jun 17;143(7):631-5 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1975 May 24;2(5968):409-11 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1972 Jul 22;2(7769):149-51 - PubMed
    1. Nat New Biol. 1973 Jun 27;243(130):260-2 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources