Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct 8;16(1):68.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0062-4.

Patients' reaction to the ethical conduct of radiographers and staff services as predictors of radiological experience satisfaction: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations
Review

Patients' reaction to the ethical conduct of radiographers and staff services as predictors of radiological experience satisfaction: a cross-sectional study

Ogbonnia Godfrey Ochonma et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: Patients' satisfaction arises from their appraisal of experience in hospital services and measuring patients' satisfaction in hospital has become a global phenomenon. To improve on patients' satisfaction, radiographers have to imbibe the right ethical attitude in their conduct while discharging duties to patients during radiological examination. The objective of this study is to understand from the patients' perspective the ethical conduct of radiographers and radiology nurses that constitute factors in patient satisfaction during routine radiological examination. The rationale of the study is to use the findings to improve radiological service delivery and improve on patient satisfaction.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study in which 300 respondents (outpatients) in two hospitals were surveyed to ascertain their satisfaction with the ethical conduct of radiographers and services provided by radiology nurses in the department. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics at 95 % confidence interval for mean scores and Z-values.

Results: Three hundred patients responded to the survey which comprised of 145 patients from the public hospital and 155 patients from the private hospital. Radiographers fell short in some ethical/professional conduct as in informed consent before treatment (mean = 2.95); radiographers' not explaining his/her experience, expectation, knowledge and equipment procedure (mean = 2.98). However, they did well in some aspects including observation of professional boundaries with patients during treatment and equity in treatment for the patients during the radiological examination (mean score = 1.43). Some services provided by staff members in the department also fell short of patients' expectation and satisfaction including explanation of what to expect during the exam (mean = 3.30), whereas they did well in their level of courtesy to patients (mean score = 4.09). There was a significant difference in the satisfaction level experienced by patients at both hospitals in favour of the private hospital.

Conclusions: There is an urgent need for improved ethical/professional conduct of radiographers and general service delivery in the radiology departments of the hospitals where this investigation was carried out to enhance patient satisfaction. Government has to improve the curricular of service providers in radiology service in the university to include ethical/professional conduct and patient/provider relationship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mohan DR, Kumar KS. A study on the satisfaction of patients with reference to hospital services. Int J Bus Econ Manag Res. 2011;1(3):15–25.
    1. Assefa F, Moses A, Yohannes HM. Assessment of clients’ satisfaction with Health Services deliveries at Jimma University Specialized Hospital. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2011;21(2):101–109. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v21i2.69050. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith M, Engelbrecht B. Guide to Assessing client Satisfaction at District Hospitals. Health Systems trust, Durban (South Africa) 2001. ISBN 1-919743-56-1.
    1. Gill L, White L. A critical review of patient satisfaction. Leadersh Health Serv. 2009;22(1):8–19. doi: 10.1108/17511870910927994. - DOI
    1. Hood C. The new public management in the 1980s: variations on a theme. J Acc Organ Soc. 1995;20(2–3):93–109. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W. - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources