Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;64(2):51-6.
doi: 10.1177/2165079915608856. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

Worker-to-Worker Violence in Hospitals: Perpetrator Characteristics and Common Dyads

Affiliations

Worker-to-Worker Violence in Hospitals: Perpetrator Characteristics and Common Dyads

Lydia E Hamblin et al. Workplace Health Saf. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Worker-to-worker (Type III) violence is prevalent in health care settings and has potential adverse consequences for employees and organizations. Little research has examined perpetrator characteristics of this type of violence. The current study is a descriptive examination of the common demographic and work-related characteristics of perpetrators of Type III workplace violence among hospital workers. Analysis was based on documented incidents of Type III violence reported within a large hospital system from 2010 to 2012. Nurses were involved as either the perpetrator or target in the five most common perpetrator-target dyads. Incidence rate ratios revealed that patient care associates and nurses were significantly more likely to be perpetrators than other job titles. By examining characteristics of perpetrators and common worker dyads involved in Type III workplace violence, hospital stakeholders and unit supervisors have a starting point to develop strategies for reducing conflict between workers.

Keywords: Type III violence; hospital workers; mental health; perpetrators; perpetrator–target dyads; worker-to-worker; workplace violence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acik Y, Deveci SE, Gunes G, Gulbayrak C, Dabak S, Saka G, … Tokdemir M. Experience of workplace violence during medical speciality training in Turkey. Occupational Medicine. 2008;58:361–366. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqn045. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnetz JE, Arnetz BB. Implementation and evaluation of a practical intervention programme for dealing with violence towards health care workers. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2000;31:668–680. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01322.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnetz JE, Aranyos D, Ager J, Upfal MJ. Development and application of a population-based system for workplace violence surveillance in hospitals. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2011a;54:925–934. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20984. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnetz JE, Aranyos D, Ager J, Upfal MJ. Worker-on-worker violence among hospital employees. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2011b;17:328–335. doi: 10.1179/107735211799041797. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnetz JE, Hamblin L, Ager J, Luborsky M, Upfal MJ, Russell J, Essenmacher L. Underreporting of workplace violence: Comparison of self-report and actual documentation of incidents in hospital settings. Workplace Health and Safety. 2015;63:200–210. doi: 10.1177/2165079915574684. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources