Reasoning about knowledge: Children's evaluations of generality and verifiability
- PMID: 26451884
- PMCID: PMC4648649
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.007
Reasoning about knowledge: Children's evaluations of generality and verifiability
Abstract
In a series of experiments, we examined 3- to 8-year-old children's (N=223) and adults' (N=32) use of two properties of testimony to estimate a speaker's knowledge: generality and verifiability. Participants were presented with a "Generic speaker" who made a series of 4 general claims about "pangolins" (a novel animal kind), and a "Specific speaker" who made a series of 4 specific claims about "this pangolin" as an individual. To investigate the role of verifiability, we systematically varied whether the claim referred to a perceptually-obvious feature visible in a picture (e.g., "has a pointy nose") or a non-evident feature that was not visible (e.g., "sleeps in a hollow tree"). Three main findings emerged: (1) young children showed a pronounced reliance on verifiability that decreased with age. Three-year-old children were especially prone to credit knowledge to speakers who made verifiable claims, whereas 7- to 8-year-olds and adults credited knowledge to generic speakers regardless of whether the claims were verifiable; (2) children's attributions of knowledge to generic speakers was not detectable until age 5, and only when those claims were also verifiable; (3) children often generalized speakers' knowledge outside of the pangolin domain, indicating a belief that a person's knowledge about pangolins likely extends to new facts. Findings indicate that young children may be inclined to doubt speakers who make claims they cannot verify themselves, as well as a developmentally increasing appreciation for speakers who make general claims.
Keywords: Cognitive development; Metacognition; Testimonial learning.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Understanding the value of telescopic testimony: With age, a predominantly White Midwestern sample of children credits knowledge to speakers whose statements go beyond the evidence.J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Jul;231:105652. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105652. Epub 2023 Feb 25. J Exp Child Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36842315
-
What I don't know won't hurt you: The relation between professed ignorance and later knowledge claims.Dev Psychol. 2017 May;53(5):826-835. doi: 10.1037/dev0000294. Epub 2017 Mar 30. Dev Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28358533 Free PMC article.
-
Older (but not younger) preschoolers reject incorrect knowledge claims.Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Mar;37(1):130-145. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12264. Epub 2018 Aug 9. Br J Dev Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30094857
-
Of Kids and Unicorns: How Rational Is Children's Trust in Testimonial Knowledge?Cogn Sci. 2020 Mar;44(3):e12819. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12819. Cogn Sci. 2020. PMID: 32090379 Review.
-
Early testimonial learning: monitoring speech acts and speakers.Adv Child Dev Behav. 2015;48:151-83. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.11.004. Epub 2015 Feb 4. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2015. PMID: 25735944 Review.
References
-
- Bering JM. The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2006;29:453–462. - PubMed
-
- Bering JM, Parker BD. Children’s attributions of intentions to an invisible agent. Developmental Psychology. 2006;42:253–262. - PubMed
-
- Birch SAJ, Vauthier SA, Bloom P. Three- and 4-year-olds spontaneously use others’ past performance to guide their learning. Cognition. 2008;107:1018–1034. - PubMed
-
- Brosseau-Liard PE, Birch SAJ. Epistemic states and traits: Preschoolers appreciate the differential informativeness of situation-specific and person-specific cues to knowledge. Child Development. 2011;82:1788–1796. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources