Carotid artery stenting for vulnerable plaques on MR angiography and ultrasonography: utility of dual protection and blood aspiration method
- PMID: 26453607
- DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012052
Carotid artery stenting for vulnerable plaques on MR angiography and ultrasonography: utility of dual protection and blood aspiration method
Abstract
Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis with vulnerable plaques is controversial. We analyzed the effect of a dual protection and blood aspiration method during CAS in patients with vulnerable plaques.
Methods: A total of 111 patients with ICA stenosis underwent CAS using the dual protection (simultaneous flow reversal and distal filter) and blood aspiration method. In 103 of 111 patients, preoperative carotid plaque was estimated by both 3 T MRI and ultrasonography (US). ICA plaques with a high intensity signal on time-of-flight-MR angiography (TOF-MRA) and/or mobile component on US were defined as vulnerable plaques. We assessed major adverse events (MAE) (ie, major stroke, myocardial infarction, and death) and hyperintense spots on diffusion-weighted images (DWI) after CAS. We then evaluated the visible debris captured by dual protection and blood aspiration during CAS.
Results: The preoperative ICA plaque on TOF-MRA and US was judged to be vulnerable in 48.5% (50/103 patients). The success rate of the CAS procedure was 100% with no MAE within 30 days. DWI showed small hyperintense spots in 18% (9/50 patients) and 18.9% (10/53 patients) in the vulnerable and non-vulnerable plaque groups, respectively. Visible debris was captured in 68% (34/50 patients) and 45.3% (24/53 patients) in the vulnerable and non-vulnerable plaque groups, respectively (p=0.0286).
Conclusions: The combination of dual protection and blood aspiration could provide effective distal embolic protection although vulnerable plaques on TOF-MRA and US had a high incidence of debris during CAS. Thus, CAS using dual protection and blood aspiration is safe in patients with vulnerable plaques.
Keywords: Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Stenosis; Stent; Technique; Ultrasound.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Similar articles
-
Usefulness of dual protection combined with blood aspiration for distal embolic protection during carotid artery stenting.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015 Mar;157(3):371-7. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2311-6. Epub 2014 Dec 30. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015. PMID: 25547718
-
Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine Concentration in Debris from Carotid Artery Stenting Correlates Independently with Signal Intensity on T1-Weighted Black-Blood Magnetic Resonance Images.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Jun;26(6):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Mar 14. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017. PMID: 28314627
-
Double balloon protection during carotid artery stenting for vulnerable carotid stenosis reduces the incidence of new brain lesions.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Jul;158(7):1377-86. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2816-2. Epub 2016 May 2. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016. PMID: 27138330
-
Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):27-42. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS142452. Epub 2015 Jul 31. J Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26230478 Review.
-
Stenting for Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Associated with Persistent Primitive Hypoglossal Artery Using Proximal Flow Blockade and Distal Protection System: A Technical Case Report and Literature Review.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jun;25(6):e98-e102. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.03.026. Epub 2016 Apr 19. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016. PMID: 27105567 Review.
Cited by
-
Editorial comment: sandwich carotid stenting: too much of a good thing?Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):75-76. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5806-3. Epub 2018 Oct 30. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30377792
-
Safety of simultaneous bilateral carotid artery stenting for bilateral carotid artery stenosis.Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Feb;26(1):19-25. doi: 10.1177/1591019919869478. Epub 2019 Aug 18. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020. PMID: 31423862 Free PMC article.
-
Retinal artery occlusion during carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection device.Neuroradiol J. 2018 Oct;31(5):504-508. doi: 10.1177/1971400918781990. Epub 2018 Jun 4. Neuroradiol J. 2018. PMID: 29862882 Free PMC article.
-
Computed Tomography Texture Analysis of Carotid Plaque as Predictor of Unfavorable Outcome after Carotid Artery Stenting: A Preliminary Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 27;11(12):2214. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122214. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34943451 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of in-stent protrusion (ISP) by intravascular ultrasound during carotid stenting: Usefulness of stent-in-stent placement for ISP.Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5636-3. Epub 2018 Jul 19. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30027409
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous