Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;29(5):301-8.
doi: 10.3341/kjo.2015.29.5.301. Epub 2015 Sep 22.

Factors Affecting Treatment Outcome of Graft Infection Following Penetrating Keratoplasty

Affiliations

Factors Affecting Treatment Outcome of Graft Infection Following Penetrating Keratoplasty

Mi Sun Sung et al. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the factors affecting treatment outcome of graft infection following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

Methods: In this retrospective study, 28 patients who underwent PKP between January 2005 and January 2013 and who were diagnosed with graft infection were classified into a treatment success group or a treatment failure group. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the results of the microbiologic investigation, were analyzed and compared. A subsequent binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors affecting treatment outcome.

Results: Graft infection occurred at a mean of 38.29 ± 36.16 months (range, 1 to 96 months) after PKP. Seventeen patients developed bacterial keratitis, and 11 patients developed fungal keratitis. Overall, of the 28 patients, nine (32.1%) were classified in the treatment failure group. Multivariate analysis identified pre-existing graft failure (p = 0.019), interval longer than 72 hours between donor death and PKP (p = 0.010), and fungal infection (p = 0.026) as significant risk factors for treatment failure.

Conclusions: Pre-existing graft failure, extended interval between donor death and PKP, and fungal infection were important risk factors for treatment failure of graft infection following PKP.

Keywords: Graft infection; Penetrating keratoplasty; Prognostic factor; Treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Distribution of intervals between penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and graft infection.

References

    1. Bates AK, Kirkness CM, Ficker LA, et al. Microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt 1):74–78. - PubMed
    1. Wright TM, Afshari NA. Microbial keratitis following corneal transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:1061–1062. - PubMed
    1. Wagoner MD, Al-Swailem SA, Sutphin JE, Zimmerman MB. Bacterial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty: incidence, microbiological profile, graft survival, and visual outcome. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1073–1079. - PubMed
    1. Leahey AB, Avery RL, Gottsch JD, et al. Suture abscesses after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1993;12:489–492. - PubMed
    1. Vajpayee RB, Sharma N, Sinha R, et al. Infectious keratitis following keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52:1–12. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources