The practice of intensive care nurses using the closed suctioning system: An observational study
- PMID: 26457102
- PMCID: PMC4598911
- DOI: 10.4103/1735-9066.164509
The practice of intensive care nurses using the closed suctioning system: An observational study
Abstract
Background: Endotracheal suctioning (ETS) is an essential procedure performed for mechanically ventilated patients. ETS can be either performed by open or closed suctioning system (CSS). There may be some concern on how closed-system ETS is practiced by intensive care nurses. This study was designed to investigate closed-system ETS practices of critical care nurses and to compare their practice with standard recommendations.
Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted during August and December 2012 to establish how critical care nurses (N = 40) perform different steps in a typical ETS practice and to compare it with the current best practice recommendations through a 23-item structured checklist. The results were categorized into three sections: Pre-suctioning, suctioning, and post-suctioning practices.
Results: Pre-suctioning, suctioning, and post-suctioning practices mean scores were 7.5, 11.75, and 8.5, respectively, out of 16, 16, and 12, respectively. The total suctioning practice score was 27.75 out of 44. Most discrepancies were observed in the patients' assessment and preparation, infection control practices, and use of an appropriate catheter. Spearman correlation coefficient indicated a significant statistical positive correlation between suctioning education period and suctioning practice score (P < 0.0001) and between working experience and suctioning practice score (P = 0.02).
Conclusions: The findings revealed that critical care nurses do not fully adhere to the best practice recommendation in CSS. We recommend that standard guidelines on ETS practice be included in the current education of critical care nurses.
Keywords: Intensive care units; Iran; intratracheal; nurses; practice; suction.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Copnell B, Tingay DG, Kiraly NJ, Sourial M, Gordon MJ, Mills JF, et al. A comparison of the effectiveness of open and closed end otrachel suction. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1655–62. - PubMed
-
- Jongerden IP, Rover MM, Grypdonck MH, Bonten MJ. Open and closed endotracheal suction systems in the mechanically ventilated intensive care patients: A mete analysis. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:260–70. - PubMed
-
- El Masry A, Williams PF, Chipman DW, Kratohvil JP, Kacmarek RM. The impact of closed endotracheal suctioning system on mechanical ventilator performance. Respir Care. 2005;50:345–53. - PubMed
-
- Pogotto IM, Oliveira LR, Cavalcanti Araujo FC, Carvalho NA, Chiavone P. Comparison between open and closed suction systems. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2008;20:331–8. - PubMed
-
- Endacott R, Jeven P, Cooper S. Oropharyngeal, tracheal, and endotracheal suctioning. In: Endacott R, editor. Clinical Nursing Skills core and advanced. 1st ed. USA: Oxford University Press; 2009. pp. 381–6.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical