Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct 12;16(1):69.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0063-3.

The importance of values in evidence-based medicine

Affiliations
Review

The importance of values in evidence-based medicine

Michael P Kelly et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has always required integration of patient values with 'best' clinical evidence. It is widely recognized that scientific practices and discoveries, including those of EBM, are value-laden. But to date, the science of EBM has focused primarily on methods for reducing bias in the evidence, while the role of values in the different aspects of the EBM process has been almost completely ignored.

Discussion: In this paper, we address this gap by demonstrating how a consideration of values can enhance every aspect of EBM, including: prioritizing which tests and treatments to investigate, selecting research designs and methods, assessing effectiveness and efficiency, supporting patient choice and taking account of the limited time and resources available to busy clinicians. Since values are integral to the practice of EBM, it follows that the highest standards of EBM require values to be made explicit, systematically explored, and integrated into decision making. Through 'values based' approaches, EBM's connection to the humanitarian principles upon which it was founded will be strengthened.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Raftery J, Powell J. Health technology assessment in the UK. Lancet. 2013;382(9900):1278–1285. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61724-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sox HC, Greenfield S. Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(3):203–205. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00125. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman D. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
    1. Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-24. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tonelli MR. The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine. Acad Med. 1998;73(12):1234–1240. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199812000-00011. - DOI - PubMed