Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Oct 12:15:28.
doi: 10.1186/s12873-015-0051-4.

Reliability and validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in an emergency department in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Reliability and validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in an emergency department in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional observational study

Zohair A Al Aseri et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Depression and anxiety are prevalent psychiatric comorbidities that are known to have a negative impact on a patient's general prognosis. But screening for these potential comorbidities in a hospital's accident and emergency department has seldom been undertaken, particularly in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere in the Middle East. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) has been extensively used to evaluate these psychiatric comorbidities in various clinical settings at all levels of health care services except for the accident and emergency department. This study therefore aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the HADS for anxiety and depression among patients at a hospital accident and emergency department in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted from January to December 2012. The participants were 257 adult patients (aged 16 years and above) who presented at the accident and emergency department of King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, who met our inclusion criteria. We used an Arabic translation of the HADS. We employed factor analysis to determine the underlying factor structure of that instrument in assessing reliability and validity.

Results: We found the Arabic version of the HADS to be acceptable for 95% of the subjects. We used Cronbach's alpha coefficient to evaluate reliability, and it indicated a significant correlation with both the anxiety (0.73) and depression (0.77) subscales of the HADS, thereby supporting the validity of the instrument. By means of factor analysis, we obtained a two-factor solution according to the two HADS subscales (anxiety and depression), and we observed a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.57; p < 0.0001) between the two subscales.

Conclusion: The HADS can be used effectively in an accident and emergency department as an initial screening instrument for anxiety and depression. It thus has great potential as part of integrated multidisciplinary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cassem EH. Depression and anxiety secondary to medical illness. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1990;13:597–612. - PubMed
    1. Uwakwe R. Psychiatric morbidity in elderly patients admitted to non-psychiatric wards in a general/teaching hospital in Nigeria. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15:346–354. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(200004)15:4<346::AID-GPS125>3.0.CO;2-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexander PJ, Dinesh N, Vidyasagar MS. Psychiatric morbidity among cancer patients and its relationship with awareness of illness and expectations about treatment outcome. Acta Oncol. 1993;32:623–626. doi: 10.3109/02841869309092441. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becker S. Detection of somatiztion and depression in primary care in Saudi Arabia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004;39:962–966. doi: 10.1007/s00127-004-0835-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. El Raufaie OE, Absood G. Validity study of the hospital anxiety and depression scale among a group of Saudi patients. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;151:687–688. doi: 10.1192/bjp.151.5.687. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types