An analysis of treatment preferences and sexual quality of life outcomes in female partners of Chinese men with erectile dysfunction
- PMID: 26459780
- PMCID: PMC5000803
- DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.159719
An analysis of treatment preferences and sexual quality of life outcomes in female partners of Chinese men with erectile dysfunction
Abstract
The impact of erectile dysfunction is distressing to both males and their female partners, but less attention has been paid to identify female partners' preferred treatment and sexual quality of life outcomes. The present analysis explores female partners' treatment preference for erectile dysfunction in Chinese Men. This was a phase 4, randomized, open-label, multicenter, crossover study in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction who were naïve to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor treatments. Eligible patients were randomized to sequential 20-mg tadalafil/100-mg sildenafil or 100-mg sildenafil/20-mg tadalafil for 8 weeks each. Of 418 patients, female partners of 64 patients agreed to enter the study; of 64 patients who entered the study with female partners, 63 were randomized, and 62 completed the study. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Significantly more couples preferred tadalafil compared with sildenafil overall (75.4% vs 24.6%; P < 0.001), and irrespective of erectile dysfunction severity at baseline (P ≤ 0.005). Significant improvements in sexual quality of life scores were reported at endpoint (Visit 8) in male patients and female partners in both tadalafil and sildenafil treatment groups (P < 0.001). Significantly higher mean changes from baseline were observed for male patients in the tadalafil group compared with the sildenafil group for the erectile function (P = 0.013) and overall satisfaction (P = 0.019) International Index for Erectile Function domains and the spontaneity domain (P < 0.001) of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scale. No major safety concerns were reported during the study. Though both treatments were effective, safe, and tolerable, more couples preferred tadalafil compared with sildenafil.
Figures

Similar articles
-
An open-label, multicenter, randomized, crossover study comparing sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in Chinese men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy.Asian J Androl. 2015 Jan-Feb;17(1):61-7. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.143244. Asian J Androl. 2015. PMID: 25370206 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized open-label trial with a crossover comparison of sexual self-confidence and other treatment outcomes following tadalafil once a day vs. tadalafil or sildenafil on-demand in men with erectile dysfunction.J Sex Med. 2012 May;9(5):1418-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02667.x. Epub 2012 Mar 16. J Sex Med. 2012. PMID: 22429760 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized clinical trial investigating treatment choice in Chinese men receiving sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction.Asian J Androl. 2017 Jul-Aug;19(4):500-504. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.175782. Asian J Androl. 2017. PMID: 27101805 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Efficacy and tolerance of PDE-5 in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in schizophrenic patients: A literature review].Encephale. 2017 Feb;43(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Sep 19. Encephale. 2017. PMID: 27658991 Review. French.
-
[Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: past, present and future].Urologiia. 2017 Apr;(1):103-107. doi: 10.18565/urol.2017.1.103-107. Urologiia. 2017. PMID: 28394532 Review. Russian.
Cited by
-
Direct comparison of tadalafil with sildenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Oct;49(10):1731-1740. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1644-5. Epub 2017 Jul 24. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017. PMID: 28741090 Free PMC article.
-
The role of the sexual partner in managing erectile dysfunction.Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Mar;13(3):168-77. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.315. Epub 2016 Feb 2. Nat Rev Urol. 2016. PMID: 26832165 Review.
-
Practical Approaches to Treat ED in PDE5i Nonresponders.Aging Dis. 2020 Oct 1;11(5):1202-1218. doi: 10.14336/AD.2019.1028. eCollection 2020 Oct. Aging Dis. 2020. PMID: 33014533 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk factors and the prognosis of sexual dysfunction in male patients with pituitary adenomas: a multivariate analysis.Asian J Androl. 2018 Jan-Feb;20(1):43-49. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_18_17. Asian J Androl. 2018. PMID: 28816201 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of the Orally Disintegrating Strip Sildenafil for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.Sex Med. 2021 Dec;9(6):100453. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100453. Epub 2021 Oct 26. Sex Med. 2021. PMID: 34710784 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hatzimouratidis K, Amar E, Eardley I, Giuliano F, Hatzichristou D, et al. Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Eur Urol. 2010;57:804–14. - PubMed
-
- Rubio-Aurioles E, Kim ED, Rosen RC, Porst H, Burns P, et al. Impact on erectile function and sexual quality of life of couples: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tadalafil taken once daily. J Sex Med. 2009;6:1314–23. - PubMed
-
- Wagner G, Fugl-Meyer KS, Fugl-Meyer AR. Impact of erectile dysfunction on quality of life: patient and partner perspectives. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12(Suppl 4):S144–6. - PubMed
-
- Brock G, Chan J, Carrier S, Chan M, Salgado L, et al. The treatment of erectile dysfunction study: focus on treatment satisfaction of patients and partners. BJU Int. 2007;99:376–82. - PubMed
-
- Eardley I, Donatucci C, Corbin J, El-Meliegy A, Hatzimouratidis K, et al. Pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7(1 PT 2):524–40. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases