Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;35(5):509-13.
doi: 10.1037/hea0000287. Epub 2015 Oct 12.

The effects of partnered exercise on physical intimacy in couples coping with prostate cancer

Karen S Lyons  1 , Kerri M Winters-Stone  1 , Jill A Bennett  1 , Tomasz M Beer  2
Affiliations

The effects of partnered exercise on physical intimacy in couples coping with prostate cancer

Karen S Lyons et al. Health Psychol. 2016 May.

Abstract

Objective: The study examined whether couples coping with prostate cancer participating in a partnered exercise program-Exercising Together (ET)-experienced higher levels of physical intimacy (i.e., affectionate and sexual behavior) than couples in a usual care (UC) control group.

Method: Men and their wives (n = 64 couples) were randomly assigned to either the ET or UC group. Couples in the ET group engaged in partnered strength-training twice weekly for 6 months. Multilevel modeling was used to explore the effects of ET on husband and wife engagement in both affectionate and sexual behaviors over time.

Results: Controlling for relationship quality, wives in ET showed significant increases in engagement in affectionate behaviors compared to wives in UC. No intervention effects were found for husbands.

Conclusion: Couple-based approaches to physical intimacy, after a cancer diagnosis, that facilitate collaborative engagement in nonsexual physical activities for the couple have potential to be effective for wives. More research is needed in this area to determine couples most amenable to such exercise strategies, optimal timing in the cancer trajectory, and the benefits of combining partnered exercise with more traditional relationship-focused strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acitelli LK, Antonucci TC. Gender differences in the link between marital support and satisfaction in older couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;67:688–698. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society . Cancer facts and figures 2012. American Cancer Society; Atlanta: 2012.
    1. Archbold PG, Stewart BJ, Greenlick MR, Harvath T. Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain. Research in Nursing & Health. 1990;13:375–384. - PubMed
    1. Arrington MI. “I don't want to be an artifical man”: Narative reconstruction of sexuality among prostate cancer survivors. Sexuality and Culture. 2003;7:30–58.
    1. Beck AM, Robinson JW, Carlson LE. Sexual intimacy in heterosexual couples after prostate cancer treatment: What we know and what we still need to learn. Urologic Oncology. 2009;27:137–143. - PubMed

Publication types