Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Oct 14:12:82.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0074-9.

Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and correlational study

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and correlational study

Dennis R Louie et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. .

Abstract

Powered robotic exoskeletons are an emerging technology of wearable orthoses that can be used as an assistive device to enable non-ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) to walk, or as a rehabilitation tool to improve walking ability in ambulatory individuals with SCI. No studies to date have systematically reviewed the literature on the efficacy of powered exoskeletons on restoring walking function. Our objective was to systematically review the literature to determine the gait speed attained by individuals with SCI when using a powered exoskeleton to walk, factors influencing this speed, and characteristics of studies involving a powered exoskeleton (e.g. inclusion criteria, screening, and training processes). A systematic search in computerized databases was conducted to identify articles that reported on walking outcomes when using a powered exoskeleton. Individual gait speed data from each study was extracted. Pearson correlations were performed between gait speed and 1) age, 2) years post-injury, 3) injury level, and 4) number of training sessions. Fifteen articles met inclusion criteria, 14 of which investigated the powered exoskeleton as an assistive device for non-ambulatory individuals and one which used it as a training intervention for ambulatory individuals with SCI. The mean gait speed attained by non-ambulatory participants (n = 84) while wearing a powered exoskeleton was 0.26 m/s, with the majority having a thoracic-level motor-complete injury. Twelve articles reported individual data for the non-ambulatory participants, from which a positive correlation was found between gait speed and 1) age (r = 0.27, 95 % CI 0.02-0.48, p = 0.03, 63 participants), 2) injury level (r = 0.27, 95 % CI 0.02-0.48, p = 0.03, 63 participants), and 3) training sessions (r = 0.41, 95 % CI 0.16-0.61, p = 0.002, 55 participants). In conclusion, powered exoskeletons can provide non-ambulatory individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete SCI the ability to walk at modest speeds. This speed is related to level of injury as well as training time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study results during PRISMA phases: a flowchart of selection process based on inclusion/exclusion criteria
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Gait speed plotted against age using individual participant data, excluding those with incomplete injuries or requiring assistance to ambulate (n = 63 from 12 studies)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Gait speed plotted against injury level using individual participant data, excluding those with incomplete injuries or requiring assistance to ambulate (n = 63 from 12 studies)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Gait speed plotted against number of training sessions using individual participant data, excluding those with incomplete injuries or requiring assistance to ambulate (n = 55 from 11 studies, one outlier removed)

References

    1. Hitzig SL, Tonack M, Campbell KA, McGillivray CF, Boschen KA, Richards K, et al. Secondary health complications in an aging Canadian spinal cord injury sample. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;87:545–55. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31817c16d6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Post M, Noreau L. Quality of life after spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005;29:139–46. doi: 10.1097/01.NPT.0000282246.08288.67. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ditunno PL, Patrick M, Stineman M, Ditunno JF. Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal cord. 2008;46:500–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102172. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saunders LL, Krause JS, DiPiro ND, Kraft S, Brotherton S. Ambulation and complications related to assistive devices after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36:652–9. doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000082. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massucci M, Brunetti G, Piperno R, Betti L, Franceschini M. Walking with the Advanced Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (ARGO) in thoracic paraplegic patients: energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory performance. Spinal Cord. 1998;36:223–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100564. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types