Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Nov 1;182(9):799-807.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv121. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

A field-validated approach using surveillance and genotyping data to estimate tuberculosis attributable to recent transmission in the United States

Comparative Study

A field-validated approach using surveillance and genotyping data to estimate tuberculosis attributable to recent transmission in the United States

Anne Marie France et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Tuberculosis genotyping data are frequently used to estimate the proportion of tuberculosis cases in a population that are attributable to recent transmission (RT). Multiple factors influence genotype-based estimates of RT and limit the comparison of estimates over time and across geographic units. Additionally, methods used for these estimates have not been validated against field-based epidemiologic assessments of RT. Here we describe a novel genotype-based approach to estimation of RT based on the identification of plausible-source cases, which facilitates systematic comparisons over time and across geographic areas. We compared this and other genotype-based RT estimation approaches with the gold standard of field-based assessment of RT based on epidemiologic investigation in Arkansas, Maryland, and Massachusetts during 1996-2000. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each approach for epidemiologic evidence of RT and calculated the accuracy of each approach across a range of hypothetical RT prevalence rates plausible for the United States. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of genotype-based RT estimates varied by approach. At an RT prevalence of 10%, accuracy ranged from 88.5% for state-based clustering to 94.4% with our novel approach. Our novel, field-validated approach allows for systematic assessments over time and across public health jurisdictions of varying geographic size, with an established level of accuracy.

Keywords: disease transmission; genotyping; molecular epidemiology; recent transmission; tuberculosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimated percentage of tuberculosis (TB) cases attributable to recent transmission as determined using state-based clustering, county-based clustering, and SaTScan-based (35) clustering, Arkansas, Maryland, and Massachusetts, January 1, 1998–September 30, 2000.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated percentage of tuberculosis (TB) cases attributable to recent transmission as determined using the novel plausible-source case approach, with distance thresholds ranging from 0 to 500 miles (800 km), Arkansas, Maryland, and Massachusetts, January 1, 1998–September 30, 2000. 1 mile = 1.6 km.

References

    1. Frieden TR, Sterling TR, Munsiff SS, et al. Tuberculosis. Lancet. 2003;362(9387):887–899. - PubMed
    1. National Tuberculosis Controllers Association; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for the investigation of contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis. Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(RR-15):1–47. - PubMed
    1. Berzkalns A, Bates J, Ye W, et al. The road to tuberculosis (Mycobacterium tuberculosis) elimination in Arkansas; a re-examination of risk groups. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90664. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borgdorff MW, van der Werf MJ, de Haas PE, et al. Tuberculosis elimination in the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(4):597–602. - PMC - PubMed
    1. France AM, Cave MD, Bates JH, et al. What's driving the decline in tuberculosis in Arkansas? A molecular epidemiologic analysis of tuberculosis trends in a rural, low-incidence population, 1997–2003. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(6):662–671. - PubMed

Publication types