Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;25(6):404-13.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004309. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

Measuring patient-perceived quality of care in US hospitals using Twitter

Affiliations

Measuring patient-perceived quality of care in US hospitals using Twitter

Jared B Hawkins et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Patients routinely use Twitter to share feedback about their experience receiving healthcare. Identifying and analysing the content of posts sent to hospitals may provide a novel real-time measure of quality, supplementing traditional, survey-based approaches.

Objective: To assess the use of Twitter as a supplemental data stream for measuring patient-perceived quality of care in US hospitals and compare patient sentiments about hospitals with established quality measures.

Design: 404 065 tweets directed to 2349 US hospitals over a 1-year period were classified as having to do with patient experience using a machine learning approach. Sentiment was calculated for these tweets using natural language processing. 11 602 tweets were manually categorised into patient experience topics. Finally, hospitals with ≥50 patient experience tweets were surveyed to understand how they use Twitter to interact with patients.

Key results: Roughly half of the hospitals in the US have a presence on Twitter. Of the tweets directed toward these hospitals, 34 725 (9.4%) were related to patient experience and covered diverse topics. Analyses limited to hospitals with ≥50 patient experience tweets revealed that they were more active on Twitter, more likely to be below the national median of Medicare patients (p<0.001) and above the national median for nurse/patient ratio (p=0.006), and to be a non-profit hospital (p<0.001). After adjusting for hospital characteristics, we found that Twitter sentiment was not associated with Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) ratings (but having a Twitter account was), although there was a weak association with 30-day hospital readmission rates (p=0.003).

Conclusions: Tweets describing patient experiences in hospitals cover a wide range of patient care aspects and can be identified using automated approaches. These tweets represent a potentially untapped indicator of quality and may be valuable to patients, researchers, policy makers and hospital administrators.

Keywords: Healthcare quality improvement; Patient satisfaction; Performance measures; Quality improvement methodologies; Quality measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geographical distribution of all US hospitals on Twitter (n=2349). Hospitals are coloured by mean sentiment, and sized by the number of patient experience tweets received in the 1-year study period. Sentiment ranges from −1 (negative) to 1 (positive).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sentiment correlated with 30-day hospital readmission rates. 30-day hospital readmission rates are plotted against average sentiment, for hospitals that have ≥50 patient experience tweets (n=297). This association displays a weak negative correlation (r=−0.215, p<0.001).

Comment in

References

    1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century. Washington DC, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Rozenblum R, Miller P, Pearson D, et al. . Patient-centered healthcare, patient engagement and health information technology: the perfect storm. In: Grando MA, Rozenblum R, Bates DW. Information technology for patient empowerment in healthcare. 1st edn Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, 2015:3–22.
    1. Zimlichman E. Using patient reported outcomes to drive patient-centered care. In: Grando MA, Rozenblum R, Bates DW. Information technology for patient empowerment in healthcare. 1st edn Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, 2015:241–56.
    1. Jha AK, Orav EJ, Zheng J, et al. . Patients’ perception of hospital care in the United States. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1921–31. 10.1056/NEJMsa0804116 - DOI - PubMed
    1. US Government. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 2009.

Publication types

MeSH terms