Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014:2014:659801.
doi: 10.1155/2014/659801. Epub 2014 Nov 10.

The Immunology of Mammary Gland of Dairy Ruminants between Healthy and Inflammatory Conditions

Affiliations
Review

The Immunology of Mammary Gland of Dairy Ruminants between Healthy and Inflammatory Conditions

Mohamed Ezzat Alnakip et al. J Vet Med. 2014.

Abstract

The health of dairy animals, particularly the milk-producing mammary glands, is essential to the dairy industry because of the crucial hygienic and economic aspects of ensuring production of high quality milk. Due to its high prevalence, mastitis is considered the most important threat to dairy industry, due to its impacts on animal health and milk production and thus on economic benefits. The MG is protected by several defence mechanisms that prevent microbial penetration and surveillance. However, several factors can attenuate the host immune response (IR), and the possession of various virulence and resistance factors by different mastitis-causing microorganisms greatly limits immune defences and promotes establishment of intramammary infections (IMIs). A comprehensive understanding of MG immunity in both healthy and inflammatory conditions will be an important key to understand the nature of IMIs caused by specific pathogens and greatly contributes to the development of effective control methods and appropriate detection techniques. Consequently, this review aims to provide a detailed overview of antimicrobial defences in the MG under healthy and inflammatory conditions. In this sense, we will focus on pathogen-dependent variations in IRs mounted by the host during IMI and discuss the potential ramifications of these variations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Different subsets of MG lymphocytes [–32].

References

    1. Harmon R. J. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science. 1994;77(7):2103–2112. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77153-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sudhan N., Sharma N. Gurgoan: Sarva Manav Vikash Samiti. 2010. Mastitis- an important production disease of dairy animals; pp. 72–88.
    1. Zecconi A., Hamanno J., Bronzo V., Moroni P., Giovannini G., Piccinini R. Biology of the Mammary Gland. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2002. Relationship between teat tissue immune defences and intramammary infections; pp. 287–293. - PubMed
    1. Sordillo L. M., Streicher K. L. Mammary gland immunity and mastitis susceptibility. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 2002;7(2):135–146. doi: 10.1023/A:1020347818725. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sordillo L. M., Shafer-Weaver K., DeRosa D. Immunobiology of the mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Science. 1997;80(8):1851–1865. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76121-6. - DOI - PubMed