Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;53(11):960-6.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000425.

Variation in Patient-reported Outcomes Across Hospitals Following Surgery

Affiliations

Variation in Patient-reported Outcomes Across Hospitals Following Surgery

Jennifer F Waljee et al. Med Care. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Although there is growing interest in applying patient-reported outcomes (PROs) toward surgical quality, the extent to which PROs vary across hospitals following surgical procedures is unknown.

Objectives: We examined variation in PROs, specifically health-related quality of life (HRQOL), across hospitals performing bariatric surgery.

Research design: A retrospective cohort study.

Subjects: The Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative is a statewide consortium of 39 hospitals performing laparoscopic gastric bypass, gastric banding, or sleeve gastrectomy (n=11,420 patients between 2008 and 2012).

Measures: We examined generic and disease-specific HRQOL measured by the Health and Activities Limitations Index (HALex) and Bariatric Quality of Life index (BQL) preoperatively and at 1 year. We measured the variation in postoperative HRQOL across hospitals, and the effect of risk and reliability adjustment on hospital ranking.

Results: In this cohort, HRQOL varied by 56% (HALex) and 37% (BQL) across hospitals. Patient factors accounted for 58% (HALex) to 71% (BQL) of the variation in HRQOL across hospitals. After risk and reliability adjustment, HRQOL varied by 18% (by HALex) and 14.5% (by BQL) across hospitals, and the proportion of patients who experienced a large improvement in HRQOL by HALex ranged from 33% to 69% and 67% to 92% by BQL. After adjusting for patient factors and reliability, these differences diminished to 55%-64% (HALex) and 79%-84% (BQL).

Conclusions: Patient factors explain a large proportion of hospital-level variation in PROs following bariatric surgery, underscoring the importance of risk adjustment. However, some variation in PROs across hospitals remains unexplained, suggesting PROs may represent a viable indicator of hospital performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Unadjusted hospital ranking by proportion of patients who experienced a large improvement in HRQOL following bariatric surgery at 1 year as measured by HALex score at 1 year following bariatric surgery. HALex indicates Health and Activities Limitations Index; HRQOL, and health-related quality of life.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Hospital ranking by proportion of patients who experienced a large improvement in HRQOL following bariatric surgery at 1 year as measured by HALex score at 1 year following bariatric surgery, adjusted for patient risk factors and reliability. HALex indicates Health and Activities Limitations Index; HRQOL, and health-related quality of life.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Unadjusted hospital ranking by proportion of patients who experienced a large improvement in HRQOL following bariatric surgery at 1 year as measured by BQL score at 1 year following bariatric surgery. BQL indicates Bariatric Quality of Life index; HRQOL, and health-related quality of life.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Hospital ranking by proportion of patients who experienced a large improvement in HRQOL following bariatric surgery at 1 year as measured by BQL score at 1 year following bariatric surgery, adjusted for patient risk factors and reliability. BQL indicates Bariatric Quality of Life index; HRQOL, and health-related quality of life.

References

    1. Birkmeyer JD. Progress and challenges in improving surgical outcomes.Br J Surg. 2012;99:1467–1469. - PubMed
    1. Finks JF, Kole KL, Yenumula PR, et al. Predicting risk for seriouscomplications with bariatric surgery: results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Ann Surg. 2011;254:633–640. - PubMed
    1. Goodney PP, Siewers AE, Stukel TA, et al. Is surgery getting safer?National trends in operative mortality. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 195:219–227. - PubMed
    1. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. Patient satisfaction aftertotal knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waljee JF, Chung KC. Objective functional outcomes and patientsatisfaction after silicone metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:47–54. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms