Variation in Patient-reported Outcomes Across Hospitals Following Surgery
- PMID: 26465124
- PMCID: PMC9621341
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000425
Variation in Patient-reported Outcomes Across Hospitals Following Surgery
Abstract
Background: Although there is growing interest in applying patient-reported outcomes (PROs) toward surgical quality, the extent to which PROs vary across hospitals following surgical procedures is unknown.
Objectives: We examined variation in PROs, specifically health-related quality of life (HRQOL), across hospitals performing bariatric surgery.
Research design: A retrospective cohort study.
Subjects: The Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative is a statewide consortium of 39 hospitals performing laparoscopic gastric bypass, gastric banding, or sleeve gastrectomy (n=11,420 patients between 2008 and 2012).
Measures: We examined generic and disease-specific HRQOL measured by the Health and Activities Limitations Index (HALex) and Bariatric Quality of Life index (BQL) preoperatively and at 1 year. We measured the variation in postoperative HRQOL across hospitals, and the effect of risk and reliability adjustment on hospital ranking.
Results: In this cohort, HRQOL varied by 56% (HALex) and 37% (BQL) across hospitals. Patient factors accounted for 58% (HALex) to 71% (BQL) of the variation in HRQOL across hospitals. After risk and reliability adjustment, HRQOL varied by 18% (by HALex) and 14.5% (by BQL) across hospitals, and the proportion of patients who experienced a large improvement in HRQOL by HALex ranged from 33% to 69% and 67% to 92% by BQL. After adjusting for patient factors and reliability, these differences diminished to 55%-64% (HALex) and 79%-84% (BQL).
Conclusions: Patient factors explain a large proportion of hospital-level variation in PROs following bariatric surgery, underscoring the importance of risk adjustment. However, some variation in PROs across hospitals remains unexplained, suggesting PROs may represent a viable indicator of hospital performance.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Birkmeyer JD. Progress and challenges in improving surgical outcomes.Br J Surg. 2012;99:1467–1469. - PubMed
-
- Finks JF, Kole KL, Yenumula PR, et al. Predicting risk for seriouscomplications with bariatric surgery: results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Ann Surg. 2011;254:633–640. - PubMed
-
- Goodney PP, Siewers AE, Stukel TA, et al. Is surgery getting safer?National trends in operative mortality. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 195:219–227. - PubMed
-
- Waljee JF, Chung KC. Objective functional outcomes and patientsatisfaction after silicone metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:47–54. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
