When things go wrong: correcting the scientific record
- PMID: 26467018
- PMCID: PMC4609179
- DOI: 10.15252/embj.201570080
When things go wrong: correcting the scientific record
Abstract
A reliable scientific literature is crucial for an efficient research process. Peer review remains a highly successful quality assurance mechanism, but it does not always prevent data and image aberrations and the publication of flawed data. Journals need to be in a position to detect such problems and take proportionate action. Publishers should apply consistent policies to correcting the published literature and adopt versioning. The scientific community ought to encourage corrections.
References
-
- Cyranoski D. Research integrity: cell-induced stress. Nature. 2014;511:140–143. - PubMed
-
- Editorial Nature. Correction or retraction? Nature. 2006;444:123–124. - PubMed
-
- Gewin V. Retractions: a clean slate. Nature. 2014;507:389–391. - PubMed
-
- Lawrence R. 2012. Citations and indexing: a novel approach from F1000 Research http://blog.f1000research.com/2012/07/16/citations-and-indexing-a-novel-...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
