Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;21(1):3-28.
doi: 10.1177/1088868315609487. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

Sleep Deprivation Impairs and Caffeine Enhances My Performance, but Not Always Our Performance

Affiliations

Sleep Deprivation Impairs and Caffeine Enhances My Performance, but Not Always Our Performance

Nadira S Faber et al. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

What effects do factors that impair or enhance performance in individuals have when these individuals act in groups? We provide a framework, called the GIE ("Effects of Grouping on Impairments and Enhancements") framework, for investigating this question. As prominent examples for individual-level impairments and enhancements, we discuss sleep deprivation and caffeine. Based on previous research, we derive hypotheses on how they influence performance in groups, specifically process gains and losses in motivation, individual capability, and coordination. We conclude that the effect an impairment or enhancement has on individual-level performance is not necessarily mirrored in group performance: grouping can help or hurt. We provide recommendations on how to estimate empirically the effects individual-level performance impairments and enhancements have in groups. By comparing sleep deprivation to stress and caffeine to pharmacological cognitive enhancement, we illustrate that we cannot readily generalize from group results on one impairment or enhancement to another, even if they have similar effects on individual-level performance.

Keywords: caffeine; enhancement; group performance; group processes; impairment; neuroenhancement; pharmacological cognitive enhancement; process gains; process losses; sleep deprivation; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Examples for interaction patterns between the variables “nominal versus actual group performance” and “impairment/enhancement absent versus present.”

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abele S., Diehl M. (2008). Finding team mates who are not prone to sucker and free-rider effects: The Protestant work ethic as a moderator of motivation losses in group performance. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 39-54. doi:10.1177/1368430207084845 - DOI
    1. Abrams D., Hopthrow T., Hulbert L., Frings D. (2006). “Groupdrink”? The effect of alcohol on risk attraction among groups versus individuals. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 67, 628-636. - PubMed
    1. Åkerstedt T. (1998). Shift work and disturbed sleep/wakefulness. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 2, 117-128. doi:10.1016/S1087-0792(98)90004-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alhola P., Polo-Kantola P. (2007). Sleep deprivation: Impact on cognitive performance. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 3, 553-567. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson C., Dickinson D. L. (2010). Bargaining and trust: The effects of 36-h total sleep deprivation on socially interactive decisions. Journal of Sleep Research, 19, 54-63. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00767.x - DOI - PubMed